Math 2.0

Number theory Proof

Proof of the existence and uniqueness of a fraction in lowest terms

Builds on Rational numbersIntegersGreatest common divisorDivisibilityCoprime integersGeneralized Euclid's lemma

Proof

We divide by the greatest common divisor for existence, and use the generalized Euclid's lemma for uniqueness. Recall that two fractions a/ba / b and c/dc / d of integers are the same rational number when ad=bca d = b c. Let qq be a rational number, and write q=c/dq = c / d with integers cc and d≠0d \neq 0.

  1. Existence. Let g=gcd⁡(c,d)g = \gcd(c, d) be the greatest common divisor. Since 11 divides cc and dd, and cc, dd are not both 00, we get g≥1g \ge 1.
  2. Since gg divides cc and dd, there are integers c′c' and d′d' with c=gc′c = g c' and d=gd′d = g d'. Since d≠0d \neq 0, also d′≠0d' \neq 0.
  3. We show that gcd⁡(c′,d′)=1\gcd(c', d') = 1. Let e≥1e \ge 1 be a common divisor of c′c' and d′d', with c′=euc' = e u and d′=evd' = e v.
  4. Then c=(ge)uc = (g e) u and d=(ge)vd = (g e) v, so geg e is a common divisor of cc and dd. Hence ge≤gg e \le g.
  5. Since g≥1g \ge 1, step 4 gives e≤1e \le 1, so e=1e = 1. Every common divisor of c′c' and d′d' is therefore at most 11, and 11 is one of them. So gcd⁡(c′,d′)=1\gcd(c', d') = 1.
  6. If d′>0d' > 0, let a=c′a = c' and b=d′b = d'. If d′<0d' < 0, let a=−c′a = -c' and b=−d′b = -d'. In both cases b>0b > 0.
  7. The integers a,ba, b have the same divisors as c′,d′c', d', because k∣xk \mid x exactly when k∣−xk \mid -x. So gcd⁡(a,b)=1\gcd(a, b) = 1.
  8. We have cb=±gc′d′=adc b = \pm g c' d' = a d, with the same sign on both sides. So a/b=c/d=qa / b = c / d = q.
  9. Uniqueness. Let a/b=a′/b′=qa / b = a' / b' = q, with b,b′>0b, b' > 0 and gcd⁡(a,b)=gcd⁡(a′,b′)=1\gcd(a, b) = \gcd(a', b') = 1. Then ab′=a′ba b' = a' b.
  10. So bb divides ab′a b'. Since bb and aa are coprime, the generalized Euclid's lemma gives b∣b′b \mid b'.
  11. In the same way, b′b' divides a′ba' b and is coprime to a′a', so b′∣bb' \mid b.
  12. Write b′=bkb' = b k with kk an integer. Since b,b′>0b, b' > 0, we get k>0k > 0, so k≥1k \ge 1 and b′≥bb' \ge b. In the same way, b≥b′b \ge b'. So b=b′b = b'.
  13. Then ab=a′ba b = a' b with b≠0b \neq 0, so (a−a′)b=0(a - a') b = 0 and a=a′a = a'. So the pair (a,b)(a, b) is unique.

Idea

Dividing the top and the bottom by their greatest common divisor leaves no common factor, and a sign change makes the bottom positive. For uniqueness, cross-multiplying shows that each denominator divides the other. Two positive numbers that divide each other are equal, and then the numerators agree too.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 27 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proofs Proof of Bézout's identity, Proof of the generalized Euclid's lemma, Proof of the commutativity of addition by induction, Proof of strong induction from ordinary induction, Proof of the well-ordering principle from strong induction, Proof of the division algorithm.

Show the path as a graph
Definition by recursion, concept, no evidence levelDefinition by recursi…conceptDivisibility, definition, no evidence levelDivisibilitydefinitionIntegers, object, no evidence levelIntegersobjectMathematical induction, concept, no evidence levelMathematical inductionconceptNatural numbers, object, no evidence levelNatural numbersobjectPeano axioms, concept, no evidence levelPeano axiomsconceptRational numbers, object, no evidence levelRational numbersobjectGreatest common divisor, definition, no evidence levelGreatest common divis…definitionSuccessor function, definition, no evidence levelSuccessor functiondefinitionCoprime integers, definition, no evidence levelCoprime integersdefinitionAddition of natural numbers, definition, no evidence levelAddition of natural n…definitionThe successor function is injective, statement, no evidence levelThe successor functio…statementZero is not a successor, statement, no evidence levelZero is not a success…statementProof of the commutativity of addition by induction, proof, no evidence levelProof of the commutat…proofOrder on the natural numbers, definition, no evidence levelOrder on the natural …definitionCommutativity of addition, statement, no evidence levelCommutativity of addi…statementProof of strong induction from ordinary induction, proof, no evidence levelProof of strong induc…proofStrong induction, statement, no evidence levelStrong inductionstatementProof of the well-ordering principle from strong induction, proof, no evidence levelProof of the well-ord…proofWell-ordering principle, statement, no evidence levelWell-ordering princip…statementProof of the division algorithm, proof, no evidence levelProof of the division…proofDivision algorithm, statement, no evidence levelDivision algorithmstatementProof of Bézout's identity, proof, no evidence levelProof of Bézout's ide…proofBézout's identity, statement, no evidence levelBézout's identitystatementProof of the generalized Euclid's lemma, proof, no evidence levelProof of the generali…proofGeneralized Euclid's lemma, statement, no evidence levelGeneralized Euclid's …statementProof of the existence and uniqueness of a fraction in lowest terms, proof, no evidence levelProof of the existenc…proof
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Definition by recursion concept
  2. Divisibility definition
  3. Integers object
  4. Mathematical induction concept
  5. Natural numbers object
  6. Peano axioms concept
  7. Rational numbers object
  8. Greatest common divisor definition
  9. Successor function definition
  10. Coprime integers definition
  11. Addition of natural numbers definition
  12. The successor function is injective statement
  13. Zero is not a successor statement
  14. Proof of the commutativity of addition by induction proof
  15. Order on the natural numbers definition
  16. Commutativity of addition statement
  17. Proof of strong induction from ordinary induction proof
  18. Strong induction statement
  19. Proof of the well-ordering principle from strong induction proof
  20. Well-ordering principle statement
  21. Proof of the division algorithm proof
  22. Division algorithm statement
  23. Proof of Bézout's identity proof
  24. Bézout's identity statement
  25. Proof of the generalized Euclid's lemma proof
  26. Generalized Euclid's lemma statement
  27. Proof of the existence and uniqueness of a fraction in lowest terms proof

Where this leads

9 pages build on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreducible_fraction, Uniqueness
About this page
TagK1CG2K3ENT
URIm2://K1CG2K3ENT
Kindproof
WritingW0 stub
MSC11A05
ProvesFraction in lowest terms
UsesRational numbers, Integers, Greatest common divisor, Divisibility, Coprime integers, Generalized Euclid's lemma
Changed4 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.