Proof of the number of injections
Builds on Cardinality of a finite setInjective functionFalling factorialRestriction of a functionBijective functionComplement principleRule of sumBijection principle
Proof
Fix with . For a set , let be the set of injective functions from to . We argue by induction on that is finite with elements.
- Let . Then , and the empty function is the only function from to . It is injective. So .
- Suppose the claim holds for all sets with elements. Let , with a bijection .
- Put and . The restriction of to is a bijection onto , so .
- By the induction hypothesis, has elements. Here is the falling factorial.
- For , the restriction is injective, so it lies in . For , let be the set of with .
- Each lies in exactly one set , namely for . So the sets are pairwise disjoint, and their union is .
- Fix and let . The map is a bijection from onto . Composing a numbering of with numbers , so , as in the bijection principle.
- By the complement principle, is finite with elements. In particular .
- For , we have . Otherwise for some , against injectivity, since .
- Conversely, for , extend by . The result is injective, because is injective and is not a value of .
- So is a bijection from to , with the extension of step 10 as inverse. Composing a numbering of with this inverse shows .
- If , then is empty, so by step 6 the set is empty. Also .
- If , the rule of sum applied to the sets gives .
- By the definition of the falling factorial, . So , and the induction is complete.
Idea
Build an injection one point at a time. The new point may go to any element of that is not already used, and exactly are used. So each step multiplies the count by the number of unused values, which gives the falling factorial.
Reading path
To understand this page from the ground up, read these 41 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proofs Proof that a composition of injections is injective, Proof that a function is bijective iff it has a two-sided inverse, Proof of the complement principle, Proof that a composition of surjections is surjective, Proof of the rule of sum, Proof of the bijection principle.
- Cardinality of a finite set definition
- Element definition
- Falling factorial definition
- Proposition concept
- Set definition
- Conjunction definition
- Implication definition
- Predicate definition
- Empty set object
- Ordered pair definition
- Intersection definition
- Existential quantifier definition
- Universal quantifier definition
- Cartesian product definition
- Disjoint sets definition
- Subset definition
- Uniqueness quantifier definition
- Binary relation definition
- Function definition
- Codomain definition
- Function composition definition
- Identity function definition
- Injective function definition
- Restriction of a function definition
- Surjective function definition
- Left inverse definition
- Right inverse definition
- Proof that a composition of injections is injective proof
- Proof that a composition of surjections is surjective proof
- Bijective function definition
- Composition of injections is injective statement
- Composition of surjections is surjective statement
- Proof of the rule of sum proof
- Proof that a function is bijective iff it has a two-sided inverse proof
- Rule of sum statement
- Bijective iff it has a two-sided inverse statement
- Proof of the complement principle proof
- Proof of the bijection principle proof
- Complement principle statement
- Bijection principle statement
- Proof of the number of injections proof
Where this leads
15 pages build on this one.
- Formula for the number of derangements
- Number of permutations
- A subgroup whose index is the smallest prime divisor of the order is normal
- Sperner's theorem
- Order of the symmetric group
- Order of the alternating group
- Number of injections
- Proof of Sperner's theorem by Lubell's chain counting
- Proof of the formula for the number of derangements by inclusion–exclusion
- Proof of the order of the symmetric group
- Proof of the order of the alternating group
- Proof that a subgroup whose index is the smallest prime divisor of the order is normal
- Proof of the number of permutations by counting injections
- Number of strings of distinct letters
- Limiting proportion of derangements
Further reading
About this page
| Tag | E1TQVD7TVM |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://E1TQVD7TVM |
| Kind | proof |
| Writing | W0 stub |
| MSC | 05A05 |
| Proves | Number of injections |
| Uses | Cardinality of a finite set, Injective function, Falling factorial, Restriction of a function, Bijective function, Complement principle, Rule of sum, Bijection principle |
| Methods | Mathematical induction |
| Changed | 4 November 2026 |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
- a source with a locator (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.