Math 2.0

Combinatorics Proof

Proof of the complement principle

Builds on Cardinality of a finite setBijective functionRule of sumDisjoint sets

Proof

We first show that every subset of a finite set is finite, by induction on the size. Then we apply the rule of sum.

  1. Claim: for each natural number nn, every subset of a set with nn elements is finite. We argue by induction on nn.
  2. For n=0n = 0, the only set with 00 elements is ∅\varnothing. Its only subset is ∅\varnothing, which is finite.
  3. Suppose the claim holds for nn. Let VV have n+1n + 1 elements, with a bijection g:{1,…,n+1}→Vg : \set{1, \dots, n+1} \to V. Let B⊆VB \subseteq V.
  4. Put v=g(n+1)v = g(n+1) and V′=V∖{v}V' = V \setminus \set{v}. The restriction of gg to {1,…,n}\set{1, \dots, n} is a bijection onto V′V', so V′V' has nn elements.
  5. The set B∖{v}B \setminus \set{v} is a subset of V′V'. By the induction hypothesis it is finite.
  6. If v∉Bv \notin B, then B=B∖{v}B = B \setminus \set{v} is finite.
  7. If v∈Bv \in B, then BB is the union of the disjoint finite sets B∖{v}B \setminus \set{v} and {v}\set{v}. By the rule of sum, BB is finite. This proves the claim.
  8. Now let UU be finite and A⊆UA \subseteq U. By the claim, AA and Ac=U∖AA^c = U \setminus A are finite.
  9. Every element of UU is in AA or in AcA^c, and no element is in both. So UU is the disjoint union of AA and AcA^c.
  10. By the rule of sum, ∣U∣=∣A∣+∣Ac∣|U| = |A| + |A^c|. Hence ∣Ac∣=∣U∣−∣A∣|A^c| = |U| - |A|.

Idea

The set UU splits into the part inside AA and the part outside AA, with no overlap. So the two sizes add up to ∣U∣|U|, and the size of the outside part is a difference. The only extra work is to check that both parts are finite.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 25 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proof Proof of the rule of sum.

Show the path as a graph
Cardinality of a finite set, definition, no evidence levelCardinality of a fini…definitionElement, definition, no evidence levelElementdefinitionProposition, concept, no evidence levelPropositionconceptSet, definition, no evidence levelSetdefinitionConjunction, definition, no evidence levelConjunctiondefinitionImplication, definition, no evidence levelImplicationdefinitionPredicate, definition, no evidence levelPredicatedefinitionEmpty set, object, no evidence levelEmpty setobjectOrdered pair, definition, no evidence levelOrdered pairdefinitionIntersection, definition, no evidence levelIntersectiondefinitionExistential quantifier, definition, no evidence levelExistential quantifierdefinitionUniversal quantifier, definition, no evidence levelUniversal quantifierdefinitionCartesian product, definition, no evidence levelCartesian productdefinitionDisjoint sets, definition, no evidence levelDisjoint setsdefinitionSubset, definition, no evidence levelSubsetdefinitionUniqueness quantifier, definition, no evidence levelUniqueness quantifierdefinitionBinary relation, definition, no evidence levelBinary relationdefinitionFunction, definition, no evidence levelFunctiondefinitionCodomain, definition, no evidence levelCodomaindefinitionInjective function, definition, no evidence levelInjective functiondefinitionSurjective function, definition, no evidence levelSurjective functiondefinitionBijective function, definition, no evidence levelBijective functiondefinitionProof of the rule of sum, proof, no evidence levelProof of the rule of …proofRule of sum, statement, no evidence levelRule of sumstatementProof of the complement principle, proof, no evidence levelProof of the compleme…proof
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Cardinality of a finite set definition
  2. Element definition
  3. Proposition concept
  4. Set definition
  5. Conjunction definition
  6. Implication definition
  7. Predicate definition
  8. Empty set object
  9. Ordered pair definition
  10. Intersection definition
  11. Existential quantifier definition
  12. Universal quantifier definition
  13. Cartesian product definition
  14. Disjoint sets definition
  15. Subset definition
  16. Uniqueness quantifier definition
  17. Binary relation definition
  18. Function definition
  19. Codomain definition
  20. Injective function definition
  21. Surjective function definition
  22. Bijective function definition
  23. Proof of the rule of sum proof
  24. Rule of sum statement
  25. Proof of the complement principle proof

Where this leads

75 pages build on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Cardinality_of_Complement
About this page
TagDYSCY9R157
URIm2://DYSCY9R157
Kindproof
WritingW0 stub
MSC05A05
ProvesComplement principle
UsesCardinality of a finite set, Bijective function, Rule of sum, Disjoint sets
MethodsMathematical induction
Changed4 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.