Proof of the recurrence for Bell numbers by the block of the last element
Builds on Bell numbersPartition of a setNumber of k-element subsetsRule of sumBijection principle
Proof
We sort the partitions by the elements outside the block of the last element.
- Let be a natural number. Let , let , and let .
- By the definition of the Bell numbers, is the number of partitions of an -element set. So counts the partitions of .
- Let be a partition of , and let be its block that contains . Let . Then .
- The other blocks are nonempty, pairwise disjoint, and their union is . So they form a partition of .
- Map to the pair .
- Conversely, let and let be a partition of . The set contains , so it is nonempty. Then is a partition of .
- These two maps are inverse to each other. So the partitions of are in bijection with the pairs , where and is a partition of .
- For a fixed with elements, there are choices of .
- By the number of -element subsets, has subsets with elements, for .
- By the rule of sum, grouping the pairs by , and by the bijection principle,
Idea
In a partition of , the block of the last element leaves out some set of the first elements. Choose with elements in ways, then partition freely in ways.
Reading path
To understand this page from the ground up, read these 52 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proofs Proof of the number of k-element subsets by induction, Proof that a composition of injections is injective, Proof that a function is bijective iff it has a two-sided inverse, Proof of the complement principle, Proof of Pascal's rule from the recursive definition, Proof that a composition of surjections is surjective, Proof of the rule of sum, Proof of the bijection principle.
- Binomial coefficient definition
- Cardinality of a finite set definition
- Combination definition
- Element definition
- Proposition concept
- Stirling numbers of the second kind definition
- Proof of Pascal's rule from the recursive definition proof
- Set definition
- Conjunction definition
- Disjunction definition
- Implication definition
- Predicate definition
- Bell numbers definition
- Pascal's rule statement
- Empty set object
- Family of sets definition
- Ordered pair definition
- Intersection definition
- Union definition
- Existential quantifier definition
- Universal quantifier definition
- Disjoint sets definition
- Cartesian product definition
- Subset definition
- Union of a family of sets definition
- Uniqueness quantifier definition
- Binary relation definition
- Partition of a set definition
- Function definition
- Codomain definition
- Function composition definition
- Identity function definition
- Injective function definition
- Surjective function definition
- Left inverse definition
- Right inverse definition
- Proof that a composition of injections is injective proof
- Proof that a composition of surjections is surjective proof
- Bijective function definition
- Composition of injections is injective statement
- Composition of surjections is surjective statement
- Proof of the rule of sum proof
- Proof that a function is bijective iff it has a two-sided inverse proof
- Rule of sum statement
- Bijective iff it has a two-sided inverse statement
- Proof of the complement principle proof
- Proof of the bijection principle proof
- Complement principle statement
- Bijection principle statement
- Proof of the number of k-element subsets by induction proof
- Number of k-element subsets statement
- Proof of the recurrence for Bell numbers by the block of the last element proof
Where this leads
1 page builds on this one.
Further reading
- Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_number, Summation formulas
About this page
| Tag | NEMG5CNN3J |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://NEMG5CNN3J |
| Kind | proof |
| Writing | W0 stub |
| MSC | 11B73 |
| Proves | Recurrence for Bell numbers |
| Uses | Bell numbers, Partition of a set, Number of k-element subsets, Rule of sum, Bijection principle |
| Changed | 4 November 2026 |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.