Proof of the number of k-element subsets by induction
Builds on Cardinality of a finite setCombinationBinomial coefficientBijective functionRule of sumComplement principleBijection principlePascal's rule
Proof
For a set and a natural number , let be the set of -combinations of , the subsets with exactly elements. We argue by induction on that for every .
- Let . Then , and its only subset has elements.
- So and , by the definition of the binomial coefficient.
- Suppose the claim holds for all sets with elements. Let , with a bijection .
- Put and . The restriction of to is a bijection onto , so .
- Only has elements, so .
- Now fix . Split into , the sets that omit , and , the sets that contain . These parts are disjoint.
- The sets in are exactly the -element subsets of . By the induction hypothesis, .
- For , the set is a subset of . By the complement principle in , it has elements.
- For , the sets and are disjoint, since . By the rule of sum, has elements, so it lies in .
- The maps and are mutually inverse. So they are bijections between and .
- By the induction hypothesis, has elements. Composing a numbering of it with numbers . So , as in the bijection principle.
- By the rule of sum, .
- By Pascal's rule, this equals . Together with step 5, the claim holds for all , and the induction is complete.
Idea
Fix one element . A subset of size either avoids , or contains together with other elements. These two cases are counted by the smaller set, and they add up exactly as the defining recursion of does.
Reading path
To understand this page from the ground up, read these 43 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proofs Proof that a composition of injections is injective, Proof that a function is bijective iff it has a two-sided inverse, Proof of the complement principle, Proof of Pascal's rule from the recursive definition, Proof that a composition of surjections is surjective, Proof of the rule of sum, Proof of the bijection principle.
- Binomial coefficient definition
- Cardinality of a finite set definition
- Combination definition
- Element definition
- Proposition concept
- Proof of Pascal's rule from the recursive definition proof
- Set definition
- Conjunction definition
- Implication definition
- Predicate definition
- Pascal's rule statement
- Empty set object
- Ordered pair definition
- Intersection definition
- Existential quantifier definition
- Universal quantifier definition
- Cartesian product definition
- Disjoint sets definition
- Subset definition
- Uniqueness quantifier definition
- Binary relation definition
- Function definition
- Codomain definition
- Function composition definition
- Identity function definition
- Injective function definition
- Surjective function definition
- Left inverse definition
- Right inverse definition
- Proof that a composition of injections is injective proof
- Proof that a composition of surjections is surjective proof
- Bijective function definition
- Composition of injections is injective statement
- Composition of surjections is surjective statement
- Proof of the rule of sum proof
- Proof that a function is bijective iff it has a two-sided inverse proof
- Rule of sum statement
- Bijective iff it has a two-sided inverse statement
- Proof of the complement principle proof
- Proof of the bijection principle proof
- Complement principle statement
- Bijection principle statement
- Proof of the number of k-element subsets by induction proof
Where this leads
22 pages build on this one.
- Stars and bars
- Recurrence for Bell numbers
- K5 and K3,3 are not planar
- Formula for the number of derangements
- Number of edges of a complete graph
- Number of k-element subsets
- Inclusion–exclusion principle
- Bertrand's ballot theorem
- Kuratowski's theorem
- Sperner's theorem
- Closed formula for Catalan numbers
- Proof of the number of edges of a complete graph
- Proof of Sperner's theorem by Lubell's chain counting
- Proof of the formula for the number of derangements by inclusion–exclusion
- Proof that K5 and K3,3 are not planar
- Proof of the closed formula for Catalan numbers by the reflection principle
- Proof of Bertrand's ballot theorem by reflection
- Proof of the inclusion–exclusion principle by counting each element
- Proof of stars and bars by a bijection with subsets
- Proof of the recurrence for Bell numbers by the block of the last element
- Inclusion–exclusion formula for elements with none of the properties
- Limiting proportion of derangements
Further reading
About this page
| Tag | 5T8YDW60RV |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://5T8YDW60RV |
| Kind | proof |
| Writing | W0 stub |
| MSC | 05A10 |
| Proves | Number of k-element subsets |
| Uses | Cardinality of a finite set, Combination, Binomial coefficient, Bijective function, Rule of sum, Complement principle, Bijection principle, Pascal's rule |
| Methods | Mathematical induction |
| Changed | 4 November 2026 |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.