Math 2.0

Commutative algebra Proof

Proof of the existence of maximal ideals by Zorn's lemma

Builds on RingIdealTwo-sided idealMaximal idealZorn's lemmaPartial orderChainUpper boundMaximal elementUnion of a family of sets

Proof

We use Zorn's lemma. We write the proof for left ideals. For two-sided ideals, read "two-sided ideal" for "left ideal" throughout; step 6 explains the one extra check.

  1. Let RR be a ring and let II be a left ideal of RR with I≠RI \neq R.
  2. A left ideal LL of RR equals RR if and only if 1∈L1 \in L. Indeed, if 1∈L1 \in L, then r=r⋅1∈Lr = r \cdot 1 \in L for every r∈Rr \in R.
  3. Let 𝒫\mathcal{P} be the set of left ideals LL of RR with I⊆LI \subseteq L and L≠RL \neq R. Inclusion is a partial order on 𝒫\mathcal{P}. The set 𝒫\mathcal{P} is nonempty, since I∈𝒫I \in \mathcal{P}.
  4. Let 𝒞⊆𝒫\mathcal{C} \subseteq \mathcal{P} be a chain. If 𝒞\mathcal{C} is empty, then II is an upper bound of 𝒞\mathcal{C} in 𝒫\mathcal{P}. So assume that 𝒞\mathcal{C} is nonempty, and let UU be the union of the members of 𝒞\mathcal{C}.
  5. The set UU is a left ideal. It contains 00, since some L∈𝒞L \in \mathcal{C} exists and 0∈L0 \in L. Let a,b∈Ua, b \in U, say a∈L1a \in L_1 and b∈L2b \in L_2 with L1,L2∈𝒞L_1, L_2 \in \mathcal{C}. Since 𝒞\mathcal{C} is a chain, we may assume L1⊆L2L_1 \subseteq L_2. Then a−b∈L2⊆Ua - b \in L_2 \subseteq U. For r∈Rr \in R, ra∈L1⊆Ur a \in L_1 \subseteq U.
  6. In the two-sided case, also ar∈L1⊆Ua r \in L_1 \subseteq U for a∈L1a \in L_1 and r∈Rr \in R. So UU is then a two-sided ideal.
  7. Every member of 𝒞\mathcal{C} contains II, so I⊆UI \subseteq U. No member contains 11 by step 2, so 1∉U1 \notin U, and U≠RU \neq R.
  8. So U∈𝒫U \in \mathcal{P}, and UU contains each member of 𝒞\mathcal{C}. Thus every chain in 𝒫\mathcal{P} has an upper bound in 𝒫\mathcal{P}.
  9. By Zorn's lemma, 𝒫\mathcal{P} has a maximal element MM. Then MM is a left ideal with I⊆MI \subseteq M and M≠RM \neq R.
  10. Let LL be a left ideal of RR with M⊆LM \subseteq L and L≠RL \neq R. Then I⊆LI \subseteq L, so L∈𝒫L \in \mathcal{P}. By the maximality of MM in 𝒫\mathcal{P}, L=ML = M.
  11. So every left ideal L⊇ML \supseteq M satisfies L=ML = M or L=RL = R. Hence MM is a maximal ideal of RR that contains II.
  12. Now let RR be a nonzero ring, so 1≠01 \neq 0. The set {0}\set{0} is an ideal, and {0}≠R\set{0} \neq R since 1∉{0}1 \notin \set{0}. Steps 1 to 11 with I={0}I = \set{0} give a maximal ideal of RR.

Idea

A proper ideal is one that avoids 11. A union of a chain of ideals that avoid 11 is again an ideal that avoids 11. So Zorn's lemma applies and gives a proper ideal containing II that cannot be enlarged without reaching the whole ring.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 36 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proof Proof of Zorn's lemma.

Show the path as a graph
Element, definition, no evidence levelElementdefinitionGroup, concept, no evidence levelGroupconceptProof of Zorn's lemma, proof, no evidence levelProof of Zorn's lemmaproofProposition, concept, no evidence levelPropositionconceptSet, definition, no evidence levelSetdefinitionRing, definition, no evidence levelRingdefinitionDisjunction, definition, no evidence levelDisjunctiondefinitionImplication, definition, no evidence levelImplicationdefinitionPredicate, definition, no evidence levelPredicatedefinitionFamily of sets, definition, no evidence levelFamily of setsdefinitionOrdered pair, definition, no evidence levelOrdered pairdefinitionUnion, definition, no evidence levelUniondefinitionIdeal, definition, no evidence levelIdealdefinitionExistential quantifier, definition, no evidence levelExistential quantifierdefinitionUniversal quantifier, definition, no evidence levelUniversal quantifierdefinitionCartesian product, definition, no evidence levelCartesian productdefinitionSubset, definition, no evidence levelSubsetdefinitionUnion of a family of sets, definition, no evidence levelUnion of a family of …definitionMaximal ideal, definition, no evidence levelMaximal idealdefinitionTwo-sided ideal, definition, no evidence levelTwo-sided idealdefinitionUniqueness quantifier, definition, no evidence levelUniqueness quantifierdefinitionBinary relation, definition, no evidence levelBinary relationdefinitionAntisymmetric relation, definition, no evidence levelAntisymmetric relationdefinitionReflexive relation, definition, no evidence levelReflexive relationdefinitionTransitive relation, definition, no evidence levelTransitive relationdefinitionFunction, definition, no evidence levelFunctiondefinitionPreorder, definition, no evidence levelPreorderdefinitionChoice function, definition, no evidence levelChoice functiondefinitionPartial order, definition, no evidence levelPartial orderdefinitionAxiom of choice, statement, no evidence levelAxiom of choicestatementMaximal element, definition, no evidence levelMaximal elementdefinitionTotal order, definition, no evidence levelTotal orderdefinitionUpper bound, definition, no evidence levelUpper bounddefinitionChain, definition, no evidence levelChaindefinitionZorn's lemma, statement, no evidence levelZorn's lemmastatementProof of the existence of maximal ideals by Zorn's lemma, proof, no evidence levelProof of the existenc…proof
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Element definition
  2. Group concept
  3. Proof of Zorn's lemma proof
  4. Proposition concept
  5. Set definition
  6. Ring definition
  7. Disjunction definition
  8. Implication definition
  9. Predicate definition
  10. Family of sets definition
  11. Ordered pair definition
  12. Union definition
  13. Ideal definition
  14. Existential quantifier definition
  15. Universal quantifier definition
  16. Cartesian product definition
  17. Subset definition
  18. Union of a family of sets definition
  19. Maximal ideal definition
  20. Two-sided ideal definition
  21. Uniqueness quantifier definition
  22. Binary relation definition
  23. Antisymmetric relation definition
  24. Reflexive relation definition
  25. Transitive relation definition
  26. Function definition
  27. Preorder definition
  28. Choice function definition
  29. Partial order definition
  30. Axiom of choice statement
  31. Maximal element definition
  32. Total order definition
  33. Upper bound definition
  34. Chain definition
  35. Zorn's lemma statement
  36. Proof of the existence of maximal ideals by Zorn's lemma proof

Where this leads

3 pages build on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krull%27s_theorem
About this page
TagS2N8KH16KH
URIm2://S2N8KH16KH
Kindproof
WritingW0 stub
MSC13A15
ProvesExistence of maximal ideals
UsesRing, Ideal, Two-sided ideal, Maximal ideal, Zorn's lemma, Partial order, Chain, Upper bound, Maximal element, Union of a family of sets
Changed4 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.