Math 2.0

Number theory Proof

Proof of the lifting-the-exponent lemma for odd primes

Builds on P-adic valuationP-adic valuation of a productEuclid's lemmaBinomial theoremCongruence modulo nCongruence is compatible with powersCongruence is compatible with multiplicationCongruence is compatible with addition

Proof

  1. Let pp be an odd prime, x,yx, y integers with p∤xp \nmid x, p∤yp \nmid y, p∣x−yp \mid x - y, and n≥1n \ge 1. Here νp\nu_p is the p-adic valuation.
  2. If x=yx = y, then xn−yn=0x^n - y^n = 0. Both sides equal ∞\infty, since νp(0)=∞\nu_p(0) = \infty. Assume from now on that x≠yx \ne y.
  3. For integers X,YX, Y and N≥1N \ge 1, put SN(X,Y)=∑j=0N−1XN−1−jYjS_N(X, Y) = \sum_{j=0}^{N-1} X^{N-1-j} Y^j. Expanding the product, the terms cancel in pairs, and XN−YN=(X−Y) SN(X,Y)X^N - Y^N = (X - Y) \, S_N(X, Y).
  4. Claim A: if p∤Xp \nmid X and p∣X−Yp \mid X - Y and p∤Np \nmid N, then p∤SN(X,Y)p \nmid S_N(X, Y). Indeed Y≡X(modp)Y \equiv X \pmod p, so each term is congruent to XN−1X^{N-1}, by powers and products of congruences.
  5. So SN(X,Y)≡NXN−1(modp)S_N(X, Y) \equiv N X^{N-1} \pmod p. By Euclid's lemma, p∤NXN−1p \nmid N X^{N-1}. This proves claim A.
  6. Claim B: if p∤Xp \nmid X and p∣X−Yp \mid X - Y, then νp(Sp(X,Y))=1\nu_p(S_p(X, Y)) = 1. Write Y=X+tY = X + t with p∣tp \mid t.
  7. Let 1≤j≤p−11 \le j \le p - 1. By the binomial theorem, Yj=Xj+jXj−1t+t2wjY^j = X^j + j X^{j-1} t + t^2 w_j for an integer wjw_j. Since p2∣t2p^2 \mid t^2, we get Xp−1−jYj≡Xp−1+jXp−2t(modp2)X^{p-1-j} Y^j \equiv X^{p-1} + j X^{p-2} t \pmod{p^2}.
  8. This also holds for j=0j = 0, where both sides equal Xp−1X^{p-1}. Summing over jj with the sum rule for congruences, Sp(X,Y)≡pXp−1+Xp−2t∑j=0p−1j(modp2)S_p(X, Y) \equiv p X^{p-1} + X^{p-2} t \sum_{j=0}^{p-1} j \pmod{p^2}.
  9. Here ∑j=0p−1j=p⋅p−12\sum_{j=0}^{p-1} j = p \cdot \frac{p-1}{2}, and p−12\frac{p-1}{2} is an integer because pp is odd. Since p∣tp \mid t, the second term is divisible by p2p^2.
  10. So Sp(X,Y)≡pXp−1(modp2)S_p(X, Y) \equiv p X^{p-1} \pmod{p^2}. Thus p∣Sp(X,Y)p \mid S_p(X, Y). As p∤Xp−1p \nmid X^{p-1}, also p2∤Sp(X,Y)p^2 \nmid S_p(X, Y). This proves claim B.
  11. Let X,YX, Y satisfy p∤Xp \nmid X, p∤Yp \nmid Y, p∣X−Yp \mid X - Y and X≠YX \ne Y. By claim B, Sp(X,Y)≠0S_p(X, Y) \ne 0, so Xp≠YpX^p \ne Y^p. By step 3 and the valuation of a product, νp(Xp−Yp)=νp(X−Y)+1\nu_p(X^p - Y^p) = \nu_p(X - Y) + 1.
  12. For the same X,YX, Y and p∤Np \nmid N, claim A gives νp(SN(X,Y))=0\nu_p(S_N(X, Y)) = 0. So νp(XN−YN)=νp(X−Y)\nu_p(X^N - Y^N) = \nu_p(X - Y).
  13. For i≥0i \ge 0, let xi=xpix_i = x^{p^i} and yi=ypiy_i = y^{p^i}. By Euclid's lemma p∤xip \nmid x_i and p∤yip \nmid y_i. By step 3, xi−yix_i - y_i is a multiple of x−yx - y, so p∣xi−yip \mid x_i - y_i.
  14. Claim: xi≠yix_i \ne y_i and νp(xi−yi)=νp(x−y)+i\nu_p(x_i - y_i) = \nu_p(x - y) + i. We argue by induction on ii. The case i=0i = 0 is step 2.
  15. If the claim holds for ii, then step 11 applies to X=xiX = x_i, Y=yiY = y_i. Since xi+1=xipx_{i+1} = x_i^p and yi+1=yipy_{i+1} = y_i^p, it gives xi+1≠yi+1x_{i+1} \ne y_{i+1} and νp(xi+1−yi+1)=νp(x−y)+i+1\nu_p(x_{i+1} - y_{i+1}) = \nu_p(x - y) + i + 1.
  16. Write n=pabn = p^a b with a=νp(n)a = \nu_p(n) and p∤bp \nmid b. Then xn−yn=xab−yabx^n - y^n = x_a^b - y_a^b.
  17. By step 12 with X=xaX = x_a, Y=yaY = y_a, N=bN = b, and then step 14, νp(xn−yn)=νp(xa−ya)=νp(x−y)+νp(n)\nu_p(x^n - y^n) = \nu_p(x_a - y_a) = \nu_p(x - y) + \nu_p(n).

Idea

Factor xn−yn=(x−y)(xn−1+⋯+yn−1)x^n - y^n = (x - y)(x^{n-1} + \dots + y^{n-1}). When x≡y(modp)x \equiv y \pmod p, the second factor is about nxn−1n x^{n-1} modulo pp. So it adds no factor of pp when p∤np \nmid n, and for n=pn = p it adds exactly one; oddness of pp kills the next correction term. Each factor pp of nn therefore adds one to the valuation.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 49 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proofs Proof of Bézout's identity, Proof of the generalized Euclid's lemma, Proof of the commutativity of addition by induction, Proof of Euclid's lemma, Proof of strong induction from ordinary induction, Proof that the p-adic valuation of a product is the sum of the valuations, Proof of Pascal's rule from the recursive definition, Proof that congruence is compatible with addition, Proof of the factorial formula for binomial coefficients by induction, Proof that congruence is compatible with multiplication, Proof of the binomial theorem by induction, Proof of the well-ordering principle from strong induction, Proof of the division algorithm, Proof that congruence is compatible with powers.

  1. Binomial coefficient definition
  2. Definition by recursion concept
  3. Divisibility definition
  4. Factorial definition
  5. Group concept
  6. Mathematical induction concept
  7. Natural numbers object
  8. Peano axioms concept
  9. Proof of Pascal's rule from the recursive definition proof
  10. Congruence modulo n definition
  11. Greatest common divisor definition
  12. Prime number definition
  13. Ring definition
  14. Successor function definition
  15. Pascal's rule statement
  16. Proof that congruence is compatible with addition proof
  17. Proof that congruence is compatible with multiplication proof
  18. Coprime integers definition
  19. P-adic valuation definition
  20. Addition of natural numbers definition
  21. Commutative ring definition
  22. The successor function is injective statement
  23. Zero is not a successor statement
  24. Congruence is compatible with addition statement
  25. Proof of the factorial formula for binomial coefficients by induction proof
  26. Congruence is compatible with multiplication statement
  27. Proof of the commutativity of addition by induction proof
  28. Order on the natural numbers definition
  29. Factorial formula for binomial coefficients statement
  30. Proof that congruence is compatible with powers proof
  31. Commutativity of addition statement
  32. Proof of strong induction from ordinary induction proof
  33. Congruence is compatible with powers statement
  34. Proof of the binomial theorem by induction proof
  35. Strong induction statement
  36. Binomial theorem statement
  37. Proof of the well-ordering principle from strong induction proof
  38. Well-ordering principle statement
  39. Proof of the division algorithm proof
  40. Division algorithm statement
  41. Proof of Bézout's identity proof
  42. Bézout's identity statement
  43. Proof of the generalized Euclid's lemma proof
  44. Generalized Euclid's lemma statement
  45. Proof of Euclid's lemma proof
  46. Euclid's lemma statement
  47. Proof that the p-adic valuation of a product is the sum of the valuations proof
  48. P-adic valuation of a product statement
  49. Proof of the lifting-the-exponent lemma for odd primes proof

Where this leads

1 page builds on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifting-the-exponent_lemma, Proof
About this page
TagRCXYRDJ7PK
URIm2://RCXYRDJ7PK
Kindproof
WritingW0 stub
MSC11A51
ProvesLifting-the-exponent lemma
UsesP-adic valuation, P-adic valuation of a product, Euclid's lemma, Binomial theorem, Congruence modulo n, Congruence is compatible with powers, Congruence is compatible with multiplication, Congruence is compatible with addition
Changed4 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.