Math 2.0

Functions of a complex variable Entire and meromorphic functions Theorem

Second main theorem of Nevanlinna theory

Builds on Meromorphic functionNevanlinna characteristicNevanlinna theoryRiemann sphere

Statement

Let ff be a meromorphic function on ℂ\C that is not constant, with Nevanlinna characteristic T(r,f)T(r, f). Let q≥3q \ge 3, and let a1,…,aqa_1, \dots, a_q be distinct points of the Riemann sphere ℂ∪{∞}\C \cup \set{\infty}. For aa in the Riemann sphere, let N‾(r,a)\overline{N}(r, a) be the counting function of the solutions of f(z)=af(z) = a counted without multiplicity, as in Nevanlinna theory. Then there is a set E⊆(0,∞)E \subseteq (0, \infty) of finite Lebesgue measure such that (q−2) T(r,f)≤∑j=1qN‾(r,aj)+S(r,f)(r∉E),(q - 2)\, T(r, f) \le \sum_{j=1}^{q} \overline{N}(r, a_j) + S(r, f) \qquad (r \notin E), where S(r,f)=O(log⁡T(r,f)+log⁡r)S(r, f) = O\big(\log T(r, f) + \log r\big) as r→∞r \to \infty outside EE.

Remarks

The proof rests on the lemma on the logarithmic derivative, which says that the mean of log⁡+∣f′/f∣\log^+ \abs{f'/f} on the circle ∣z∣=r\abs{z} = r is small compared with T(r,f)T(r, f) outside an exceptional set. If ff is not rational, then log⁡r=o(T(r,f))\log r = o(T(r, f)), so S(r,f)=o(T(r,f))S(r, f) = o(T(r, f)) outside EE. If ff has finite order, the exceptional set EE can be omitted. For transcendental ff, dividing by T(r,f)T(r, f) and using the first main theorem gives the defect relation ∑aδ(a)≤2\sum_a \delta(a) \le 2, where the sum runs over all points of the Riemann sphere. For example, eze^z has δ(0)=δ(∞)=1\delta(0) = \delta(\infty) = 1, so the relation is sharp.

Going deeper

For a student

Picard's little theorem follows at once: if a transcendental meromorphic ff omitted three values, the right side would be S(r,f)=o(T(r,f))S(r, f) = o(T(r, f)) while the left side is at least T(r,f)T(r, f). The theorem also implies that the set of values aa with δ(a)>0\delta(a) > 0 is countable. Counting without multiplicity yields results on ramification, such as bounds on the number of totally ramified values. Ahlfors theory gives a geometric proof of a similar inequality, based on covering surfaces.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 19 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Complex numbers object
  2. Complex plane concept
  3. Nevanlinna characteristic concept
  4. Nevanlinna theory concept
  5. Real numbers object
  6. Set bounded above definition
  7. Real and imaginary parts definition
  8. Riemann sphere definition
  9. Supremum definition
  10. Completeness axiom statement
  11. Existence of square roots of nonnegative reals statement
  12. Square root definition
  13. Modulus of a complex number definition
  14. Complex differentiability definition
  15. Holomorphic function definition
  16. Isolated singularity definition
  17. Pole definition
  18. Meromorphic function definition
  19. Second main theorem of Nevanlinna theory statement

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nevanlinna_theory
About this page
TagGWYE6745JK
URIm2://GWYE6745JK
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC30D35
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status GWYE6745JK.
AboutNevanlinna theory, Nevanlinna characteristic
UsesMeromorphic function, Nevanlinna characteristic, Nevanlinna theory, Riemann sphere
Changed2 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.