Math 2.0

Mathematical logic and foundations Proof

Proof of the comparability of cardinals from Zorn's lemma

Builds on Zorn's lemmaPartial orderChainUpper boundMaximal elementInjective functionFunctionUnion of a family of setsOrder of cardinals

Proof

We apply Zorn's lemma to the partial injections from AA to BB.

  1. Let AA and BB be sets. A partial injection is an injective function p ⁣:D→Bp \colon D \to B with D⊆AD \subseteq A. We view pp as its set of pairs {(a,p(a)):a∈D}\{(a, p(a)) : a \in D\}.
  2. Let QQ be the set of partial injections, ordered by inclusion ⊆\subseteq. This is a partial order. The empty function lies in QQ, so QQ is nonempty.
  3. Let KK be a chain of QQ. If KK is empty, the empty function is an upper bound of KK.
  4. Let KK be nonempty, and let q=⋃p∈Kpq = \bigcup_{p \in K} p be the union of these sets of pairs.
  5. Let (a,b),(a′,b′)∈q(a, b), (a', b') \in q, with (a,b)∈p(a, b) \in p and (a′,b′)∈p′(a', b') \in p' for p,p′∈Kp, p' \in K. Since KK is a chain, both pairs lie in one member r∈Kr \in K, the larger of pp and p′p'.
  6. If a=a′a = a', then b=b′b = b', since rr is a function. If b=b′b = b', then a=a′a = a', since rr is injective.
  7. By step 6, qq is an injective function from a subset of AA to BB. So q∈Qq \in Q, and qq is an upper bound of KK.
  8. By Zorn's lemma, QQ has a maximal element m ⁣:D→Bm \colon D \to B. Let E=m(D)E = m(D) be its image.
  9. Suppose that D≠AD \neq A and E≠BE \neq B. Pick a∈A∖Da \in A \setminus D and b∈B∖Eb \in B \setminus E.
  10. Then m∪{(a,b)}m \cup \{(a, b)\} is a function on D∪{a}D \cup \{a\}, and it is injective, because b∉Eb \notin E. It lies in QQ and strictly contains mm, contradicting maximality.
  11. So D=AD = A or E=BE = B. If D=AD = A, then m ⁣:A→Bm \colon A \to B is injective.
  12. If E=BE = B, then m ⁣:D→Bm \colon D \to B is a bijection. Its inverse m−1 ⁣:B→D⊆Am^{-1} \colon B \to D \subseteq A is an injective function from BB to AA.
  13. So there is an injection from AA to BB or from BB to AA. By the order of cardinals, ∣A∣≤∣B∣|A| \le |B| or ∣B∣≤∣A∣|B| \le |A|.

Idea

Build an injection from AA to BB as far as possible. Zorn's lemma gives one that cannot be extended. It cannot be extended only if it has used up all of AA or all of BB, and each case gives an injection in one direction.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 38 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proof Proof of Zorn's lemma.

Show the path as a graph
Element, definition, no evidence levelElementdefinitionProof of Zorn's lemma, proof, no evidence levelProof of Zorn's lemmaproofProposition, concept, no evidence levelPropositionconceptSet, definition, no evidence levelSetdefinitionDisjunction, definition, no evidence levelDisjunctiondefinitionImplication, definition, no evidence levelImplicationdefinitionPredicate, definition, no evidence levelPredicatedefinitionFamily of sets, definition, no evidence levelFamily of setsdefinitionOrdered pair, definition, no evidence levelOrdered pairdefinitionUnion, definition, no evidence levelUniondefinitionExistential quantifier, definition, no evidence levelExistential quantifierdefinitionUniversal quantifier, definition, no evidence levelUniversal quantifierdefinitionCartesian product, definition, no evidence levelCartesian productdefinitionSubset, definition, no evidence levelSubsetdefinitionUnion of a family of sets, definition, no evidence levelUnion of a family of …definitionUniqueness quantifier, definition, no evidence levelUniqueness quantifierdefinitionBinary relation, definition, no evidence levelBinary relationdefinitionAntisymmetric relation, definition, no evidence levelAntisymmetric relationdefinitionReflexive relation, definition, no evidence levelReflexive relationdefinitionTransitive relation, definition, no evidence levelTransitive relationdefinitionFunction, definition, no evidence levelFunctiondefinitionPreorder, definition, no evidence levelPreorderdefinitionChoice function, definition, no evidence levelChoice functiondefinitionCodomain, definition, no evidence levelCodomaindefinitionInjective function, definition, no evidence levelInjective functiondefinitionPartial order, definition, no evidence levelPartial orderdefinitionAxiom of choice, statement, no evidence levelAxiom of choicestatementSurjective function, definition, no evidence levelSurjective functiondefinitionMaximal element, definition, no evidence levelMaximal elementdefinitionTotal order, definition, no evidence levelTotal orderdefinitionUpper bound, definition, no evidence levelUpper bounddefinitionBijective function, definition, no evidence levelBijective functiondefinitionChain, definition, no evidence levelChaindefinitionEquinumerous sets, definition, no evidence levelEquinumerous setsdefinitionZorn's lemma, statement, no evidence levelZorn's lemmastatementCardinality, definition, no evidence levelCardinalitydefinitionOrder of cardinals, definition, no evidence levelOrder of cardinalsdefinitionProof of the comparability of cardinals from Zorn's lemma, proof, no evidence levelProof of the comparab…proof
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Element definition
  2. Proof of Zorn's lemma proof
  3. Proposition concept
  4. Set definition
  5. Disjunction definition
  6. Implication definition
  7. Predicate definition
  8. Family of sets definition
  9. Ordered pair definition
  10. Union definition
  11. Existential quantifier definition
  12. Universal quantifier definition
  13. Cartesian product definition
  14. Subset definition
  15. Union of a family of sets definition
  16. Uniqueness quantifier definition
  17. Binary relation definition
  18. Antisymmetric relation definition
  19. Reflexive relation definition
  20. Transitive relation definition
  21. Function definition
  22. Preorder definition
  23. Choice function definition
  24. Codomain definition
  25. Injective function definition
  26. Partial order definition
  27. Axiom of choice statement
  28. Surjective function definition
  29. Maximal element definition
  30. Total order definition
  31. Upper bound definition
  32. Bijective function definition
  33. Chain definition
  34. Equinumerous sets definition
  35. Zorn's lemma statement
  36. Cardinality definition
  37. Order of cardinals definition
  38. Proof of the comparability of cardinals from Zorn's lemma proof

Where this leads

1 page builds on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://andrescaicedo.wordpress.com/2014/09/26/comparability-of-cardinals-from-zorns-lemma/
About this page
TagXHTB10CSKT
URIm2://XHTB10CSKT
Kindproof
WritingW0 stub
MSC03E10
ProvesComparability of cardinals
UsesZorn's lemma, Partial order, Chain, Upper bound, Maximal element, Injective function, Function, Union of a family of sets, Order of cardinals
Changed4 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.