Math 2.0

General topology Proof

Proof of the finite intersection property characterisation of compactness

Builds on Topological spaceCompact setClosed setOpen setCompactness via open covers

Proof

We pass to complements and use compactness via open covers. We read "finitely many indices" as allowing none. For no index, the intersection K∩Fi1∩⋯∩FinK \cap F_{i_1} \cap \cdots \cap F_{i_n} is KK itself.

  1. Let XX be a topological space, let K⊆XK \subseteq X, and let (Fi)i∈I(F_i)_{i \in I} be closed subsets of XX. Let Ui=X∖FiU_i = X \setminus F_i, an open set.
  2. Claim: for each J⊆IJ \subseteq I, K⊆⋃j∈JUjK \subseteq \bigcup_{j \in J} U_j holds if and only if K∩⋂j∈JFj=∅K \cap \bigcap_{j \in J} F_j = \emptyset. For J=∅J = \emptyset, the empty union is ∅\emptyset and K∩⋂j∈∅FjK \cap \bigcap_{j \in \emptyset} F_j means KK.
  3. Proof of the claim: a point x∈Kx \in K lies outside ⋂j∈JFj\bigcap_{j \in J} F_j if and only if x∉Fjx \notin F_j for some j∈Jj \in J. This means x∈Ujx \in U_j for some j∈Jj \in J. So each point of KK lies in ⋃j∈JUj\bigcup_{j \in J} U_j if and only if no point of KK lies in ⋂j∈JFj\bigcap_{j \in J} F_j.
  4. Assume KK is compact. Let (Fi)(F_i) satisfy K∩Fi1∩⋯∩Fin≠∅K \cap F_{i_1} \cap \cdots \cap F_{i_n} \ne \emptyset for all finitely many indices.
  5. Suppose K∩⋂i∈IFi=∅K \cap \bigcap_{i \in I} F_i = \emptyset. By step 2 with J=IJ = I, the open sets UiU_i cover KK.
  6. By compactness via open covers, there are finitely many indices i1,…,ini_1, \ldots, i_n with K⊆Ui1∪⋯∪UinK \subseteq U_{i_1} \cup \cdots \cup U_{i_n}.
  7. By step 2 with J={i1,…,in}J = \set{i_1, \ldots, i_n}, this gives K∩Fi1∩⋯∩Fin=∅K \cap F_{i_1} \cap \cdots \cap F_{i_n} = \emptyset. This contradicts step 4.
  8. So K∩⋂i∈IFi≠∅K \cap \bigcap_{i \in I} F_i \ne \emptyset, and KK has the property.
  9. Now assume KK has the property. Let (Ui)i∈I(U_i)_{i \in I} be open sets of XX that cover KK. Let Fi=X∖UiF_i = X \setminus U_i, a closed set.
  10. Suppose no finite subfamily of (Ui)(U_i) covers KK. By step 2, K∩Fi1∩⋯∩Fin≠∅K \cap F_{i_1} \cap \cdots \cap F_{i_n} \ne \emptyset for all finitely many indices.
  11. By the property, K∩⋂i∈IFi≠∅K \cap \bigcap_{i \in I} F_i \ne \emptyset. By step 2 with J=IJ = I, the sets UiU_i do not cover KK. This contradicts step 9.
  12. So some finite subfamily of (Ui)(U_i) covers KK. By compactness via open covers, KK is compact.

Idea

Closed sets with an empty intersection inside KK are the same as open sets, their complements, that cover KK. So "every open cover has a finite subcover" turns into "if all finite intersections meet KK, the whole intersection meets KK".

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 36 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proof Proof that compactness of a subset can be tested with open sets of the ambient space.

Show the path as a graph
Element, definition, no evidence levelElementdefinitionProposition, concept, no evidence levelPropositionconceptReal numbers, object, no evidence levelReal numbersobjectSet, definition, no evidence levelSetdefinitionConjunction, definition, no evidence levelConjunctiondefinitionDisjunction, definition, no evidence levelDisjunctiondefinitionImplication, definition, no evidence levelImplicationdefinitionPredicate, definition, no evidence levelPredicatedefinitionEmpty set, object, no evidence levelEmpty setobjectFamily of sets, definition, no evidence levelFamily of setsdefinitionOrdered pair, definition, no evidence levelOrdered pairdefinitionIntersection, definition, no evidence levelIntersectiondefinitionUnion, definition, no evidence levelUniondefinitionExistential quantifier, definition, no evidence levelExistential quantifierdefinitionUniversal quantifier, definition, no evidence levelUniversal quantifierdefinitionCartesian product, definition, no evidence levelCartesian productdefinitionSubset, definition, no evidence levelSubsetdefinitionUnion of a family of sets, definition, no evidence levelUnion of a family of …definitionUniqueness quantifier, definition, no evidence levelUniqueness quantifierdefinitionBinary relation, definition, no evidence levelBinary relationdefinitionUniversal set, definition, no evidence levelUniversal setdefinitionTopological space, definition, no evidence levelTopological spacedefinitionComplement, definition, no evidence levelComplementdefinitionFunction, definition, no evidence levelFunctiondefinitionSubspace topology, definition, no evidence levelSubspace topologydefinitionMetric space, definition, no evidence levelMetric spacedefinitionOpen ball, definition, no evidence levelOpen balldefinitionMetric topology, definition, no evidence levelMetric topologydefinitionOpen set, definition, no evidence levelOpen setdefinitionClosed set, definition, no evidence levelClosed setdefinitionOpen cover, definition, no evidence levelOpen coverdefinitionCompact space, definition, no evidence levelCompact spacedefinitionCompact set, definition, no evidence levelCompact setdefinitionProof that compactness of a subset can be tested with open sets of the ambient space, proof, no evidence levelProof that compactnes…proofCompactness via open covers, statement, no evidence levelCompactness via open …statementProof of the finite intersection property characterisation of compactness, proof, no evidence levelProof of the finite i…proof
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Element definition
  2. Proposition concept
  3. Real numbers object
  4. Set definition
  5. Conjunction definition
  6. Disjunction definition
  7. Implication definition
  8. Predicate definition
  9. Empty set object
  10. Family of sets definition
  11. Ordered pair definition
  12. Intersection definition
  13. Union definition
  14. Existential quantifier definition
  15. Universal quantifier definition
  16. Cartesian product definition
  17. Subset definition
  18. Union of a family of sets definition
  19. Uniqueness quantifier definition
  20. Binary relation definition
  21. Universal set definition
  22. Topological space definition
  23. Complement definition
  24. Function definition
  25. Subspace topology definition
  26. Metric space definition
  27. Open ball definition
  28. Metric topology definition
  29. Open set definition
  30. Closed set definition
  31. Open cover definition
  32. Compact space definition
  33. Compact set definition
  34. Proof that compactness of a subset can be tested with open sets of the ambient space proof
  35. Compactness via open covers statement
  36. Proof of the finite intersection property characterisation of compactness proof

Where this leads

9 pages build on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Equivalence_of_Definitions_of_Compact_Topological_Space
About this page
TagXXXJW6YYE5
URIm2://XXXJW6YYE5
Kindproof
WritingW0 stub
MSC54D30
ProvesFinite intersection property
UsesTopological space, Compact set, Closed set, Open set, Compactness via open covers
Changed4 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.