Proof of the finite intersection property characterisation of compactness
Builds on Topological spaceCompact setClosed setOpen setCompactness via open covers
Proof
We pass to complements and use compactness via open covers. We read "finitely many indices" as allowing none. For no index, the intersection is itself.
- Let be a topological space, let , and let be closed subsets of . Let , an open set.
- Claim: for each , holds if and only if . For , the empty union is and means .
- Proof of the claim: a point lies outside if and only if for some . This means for some . So each point of lies in if and only if no point of lies in .
- Assume is compact. Let satisfy for all finitely many indices.
- Suppose . By step 2 with , the open sets cover .
- By compactness via open covers, there are finitely many indices with .
- By step 2 with , this gives . This contradicts step 4.
- So , and has the property.
- Now assume has the property. Let be open sets of that cover . Let , a closed set.
- Suppose no finite subfamily of covers . By step 2, for all finitely many indices.
- By the property, . By step 2 with , the sets do not cover . This contradicts step 9.
- So some finite subfamily of covers . By compactness via open covers, is compact.
Idea
Closed sets with an empty intersection inside are the same as open sets, their complements, that cover . So "every open cover has a finite subcover" turns into "if all finite intersections meet , the whole intersection meets ".
Reading path
To understand this page from the ground up, read these 36 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proof Proof that compactness of a subset can be tested with open sets of the ambient space.
Show the path as a graph
- no evidence level
- Element definition
- Proposition concept
- Real numbers object
- Set definition
- Conjunction definition
- Disjunction definition
- Implication definition
- Predicate definition
- Empty set object
- Family of sets definition
- Ordered pair definition
- Intersection definition
- Union definition
- Existential quantifier definition
- Universal quantifier definition
- Cartesian product definition
- Subset definition
- Union of a family of sets definition
- Uniqueness quantifier definition
- Binary relation definition
- Universal set definition
- Topological space definition
- Complement definition
- Function definition
- Subspace topology definition
- Metric space definition
- Open ball definition
- Metric topology definition
- Open set definition
- Closed set definition
- Open cover definition
- Compact space definition
- Compact set definition
- Proof that compactness of a subset can be tested with open sets of the ambient space proof
- Compactness via open covers statement
- Proof of the finite intersection property characterisation of compactness proof
Where this leads
9 pages build on this one.
- Finite intersection property
- Tychonoff's theorem
- Cantor set is homeomorphic to the space of binary sequences
- Proof of Tychonoff's theorem by maximal families with the finite intersection property
- Brouwer's characterization of the Cantor space
- Proof that the Cantor set is homeomorphic to the space of binary sequences
- Cantor algebra
- Cantor space
- Algorithmic randomness
Further reading
About this page
| Tag | XXXJW6YYE5 |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://XXXJW6YYE5 |
| Kind | proof |
| Writing | W0 stub |
| MSC | 54D30 |
| Proves | Finite intersection property |
| Uses | Topological space, Compact set, Closed set, Open set, Compactness via open covers |
| Changed | 4 November 2026 |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
- a source with a locator (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.