Math 2.0

Real functions Proof

Proof of the inequality of arithmetic and geometric means by induction

Builds on The reals form an ordered field

Proof

We argue by induction on the number of terms. All computations take place in the ordered field ℝ\R.

  1. For nonnegative reals x1,…,xnx_1, \dots, x_n, let P=x1⋯xnP = x_1 \cdots x_n and μ=(x1+⋯+xn)/n\mu = (x_1 + \dots + x_n)/n. Then P≥0P \ge 0 and μ≥0\mu \ge 0.
  2. The geometric mean g=Png = \sqrt[n]{P} is the real number g≥0g \ge 0 with gn=Pg^n = P.
  3. Lemma. If 0≤a<b0 \le a < b and n≥1n \ge 1, then an<bna^n < b^n. For n=1n = 1 this is the hypothesis. If an<bna^n < b^n, then an+1=ana≤anb<bnb=bn+1a^{n+1} = a^n a \le a^n b < b^n b = b^{n+1}, since an≥0a^n \ge 0 and b>0b > 0.
  4. Claim C(n)C(n): for all nonnegative x1,…,xnx_1, \dots, x_n, we have P≤μnP \le \mu^n, and P<μnP < \mu^n unless all xix_i are equal. We prove C(n)C(n) for each n≥1n \ge 1 by induction.
  5. Base case n=1n = 1. Then P=x1=μP = x_1 = \mu, and the single number is equal to itself.
  6. Induction step. Assume C(n)C(n) for some n≥1n \ge 1. Let x1,…,xn+1≥0x_1, \dots, x_{n+1} \ge 0 have product PP and mean μ\mu.
  7. If all xix_i are equal, then each equals μ\mu, and P=μn+1P = \mu^{n+1}.
  8. Suppose not all xix_i are equal. Then some xk≠μx_k \ne \mu. Say xk>μx_k > \mu. If all xi≥μx_i \ge \mu, the sum exceeds (n+1)μ(n+1)\mu, which is false. So some xj<μx_j < \mu. The case xk<μx_k < \mu is the same with the inequalities reversed.
  9. Reorder the numbers so that xn>μx_n > \mu and xn+1<μx_{n+1} < \mu. This changes neither PP nor μ\mu. Also μ>xn+1≥0\mu > x_{n+1} \ge 0, so μ>0\mu > 0.
  10. Let y=xn+xn+1−μy = x_n + x_{n+1} - \mu. Then y≥xn−μ>0y \ge x_n - \mu > 0.
  11. The nn numbers x1,…,xn−1,yx_1, \dots, x_{n-1}, y have sum (n+1)μ−μ=nμ(n+1)\mu - \mu = n \mu, so their mean is μ\mu.
  12. Let Q=x1⋯xn−1Q = x_1 \cdots x_{n-1}, with Q=1Q = 1 when n=1n = 1. Then Q≥0Q \ge 0. By C(n)C(n) for the numbers of step 11, Qy≤μnQ y \le \mu^n.
  13. Expand both sides to check that μy−xnxn+1=(xn−μ)(μ−xn+1)\mu y - x_n x_{n+1} = (x_n - \mu)(\mu - x_{n+1}). Both factors are positive by step 9, so xnxn+1<μyx_n x_{n+1} < \mu y.
  14. If Q=0Q = 0, then P=0<μn+1P = 0 < \mu^{n+1}, by step 9.
  15. If Q>0Q > 0, then by steps 13 and 12, P=Qxnxn+1<Qμy=μ(Qy)≤μ⋅μn=μn+1P = Q x_n x_{n+1} < Q \mu y = \mu (Q y) \le \mu \cdot \mu^n = \mu^{n+1}.
  16. Steps 7, 14 and 15 prove C(n+1)C(n+1). By induction, C(n)C(n) holds for each n≥1n \ge 1.
  17. Now let g=Png = \sqrt[n]{P}. If g>μg > \mu, the lemma gives P=gn>μnP = g^n > \mu^n, against C(n)C(n). So g≤μg \le \mu.
  18. If all xix_i equal some cc, then P=cnP = c^n and μ=c\mu = c. Two distinct nonnegative numbers have distinct nnth powers, by the lemma. Since c≥0c \ge 0 and cn=P=gnc^n = P = g^n, we get g=cg = c. So g=μg = \mu.
  19. If not all xix_i are equal, then P<μnP < \mu^n by C(n)C(n). If g=μg = \mu, then P=μnP = \mu^n, which is false. So g<μg < \mu.
  20. Thus x1⋯xnn≤(x1+⋯+xn)/n\sqrt[n]{x_1 \cdots x_n} \le (x_1 + \dots + x_n)/n, with equality if and only if x1=⋯=xnx_1 = \dots = x_n.

Idea

If the numbers are not all equal, take one above the mean and one below it. Replace them by a single number that keeps the mean. This reduces the count by one, and the product of the two old numbers is less than the mean times the new one.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 29 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proof Proof that the reals form an ordered field, with the Cauchy sequence construction.

Show the path as a graph
Construction of the reals from Cauchy sequences, concept, no evidence levelConstruction of the r…conceptElement, definition, no evidence levelElementdefinitionIntegers, object, no evidence levelIntegersobjectOrdered field, definition, no evidence levelOrdered fielddefinitionProposition, concept, no evidence levelPropositionconceptRational numbers, object, no evidence levelRational numbersobjectReal numbers, object, no evidence levelReal numbersobjectSet, definition, no evidence levelSetdefinitionRing of integers, statement, no evidence levelRing of integersstatementImplication, definition, no evidence levelImplicationdefinitionPredicate, definition, no evidence levelPredicatedefinitionThe reals form a field, statement, no evidence levelThe reals form a fieldstatementOrdered pair, definition, no evidence levelOrdered pairdefinitionThe rationals form a field, statement, no evidence levelThe rationals form a …statementUniversal quantifier, definition, no evidence levelUniversal quantifierdefinitionCartesian product, definition, no evidence levelCartesian productdefinitionSubset, definition, no evidence levelSubsetdefinitionThe rationals form an ordered field, statement, no evidence levelThe rationals form an…statementBinary relation, definition, no evidence levelBinary relationdefinitionOrder on the reals, definition, no evidence levelOrder on the realsdefinitionAntisymmetric relation, definition, no evidence levelAntisymmetric relationdefinitionReflexive relation, definition, no evidence levelReflexive relationdefinitionTransitive relation, definition, no evidence levelTransitive relationdefinitionPreorder, definition, no evidence levelPreorderdefinitionPartial order, definition, no evidence levelPartial orderdefinitionTotal order, definition, no evidence levelTotal orderdefinitionProof that the reals form an ordered field, with the Cauchy sequence construction, proof, no evidence levelProof that the reals …proofThe reals form an ordered field, statement, no evidence levelThe reals form an ord…statementProof of the inequality of arithmetic and geometric means by induction, proof, no evidence levelProof of the inequali…proof
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Construction of the reals from Cauchy sequences concept
  2. Element definition
  3. Integers object
  4. Ordered field definition
  5. Proposition concept
  6. Rational numbers object
  7. Real numbers object
  8. Set definition
  9. Ring of integers statement
  10. Implication definition
  11. Predicate definition
  12. The reals form a field statement
  13. Ordered pair definition
  14. The rationals form a field statement
  15. Universal quantifier definition
  16. Cartesian product definition
  17. Subset definition
  18. The rationals form an ordered field statement
  19. Binary relation definition
  20. Order on the reals definition
  21. Antisymmetric relation definition
  22. Reflexive relation definition
  23. Transitive relation definition
  24. Preorder definition
  25. Partial order definition
  26. Total order definition
  27. Proof that the reals form an ordered field, with the Cauchy sequence construction proof
  28. The reals form an ordered field statement
  29. Proof of the inequality of arithmetic and geometric means by induction proof

Where this leads

29 pages build on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AM%E2%80%93GM_inequality, Proof by induction
About this page
Tag8EJJF9T071
URIm2://8EJJF9T071
Kindproof
WritingW0 stub
MSC26E60
ProvesInequality of arithmetic and geometric means
UsesThe reals form an ordered field
MethodsMathematical induction
Changed4 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.