Math 2.0

Group theory and generalizations Proof

Proof that orbits partition the set

Builds on Group actionOrbitEquivalence relationEquivalence classEquivalence classes form a partition

Proof

We check the three axioms of an equivalence relation, then identify the classes. Let ee be the identity of GG.

  1. Reflexivity. By the first axiom of an action, x=e⋅xx = e \cdot x. So x∼xx \sim x for each x∈Xx \in X.
  2. Symmetry. Let x∼yx \sim y, so y=g⋅xy = g \cdot x for some g∈Gg \in G. By the two axioms of an action, g−1⋅y=g−1⋅(g⋅x)=(g−1g)⋅x=e⋅x=xg^{-1} \cdot y = g^{-1} \cdot (g \cdot x) = (g^{-1} g) \cdot x = e \cdot x = x.
  3. So x=g−1⋅yx = g^{-1} \cdot y with g−1∈Gg^{-1} \in G, and y∼xy \sim x.
  4. Transitivity. Let x∼yx \sim y and y∼zy \sim z, so y=g⋅xy = g \cdot x and z=h⋅yz = h \cdot y with g,h∈Gg, h \in G. By the second axiom, z=h⋅(g⋅x)=(hg)⋅xz = h \cdot (g \cdot x) = (hg) \cdot x.
  5. Since hg∈Ghg \in G, we get x∼zx \sim z. By steps 1 to 4, ∼\sim is an equivalence relation on XX.
  6. The equivalence class of xx is {y∈X:x∼y}={g⋅x:g∈G}\set{y \in X : x \sim y} = \set{g \cdot x : g \in G}. This is the orbit G⋅xG \cdot x. So the equivalence classes are exactly the orbits.
  7. The equivalence classes form a partition of XX. So each point of XX lies in exactly one orbit.

Idea

The group axioms are exactly what is needed: the identity gives reflexivity, inverses give symmetry, and closure under products gives transitivity. Equivalence classes always partition a set, so the orbits do too.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 36 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proof Proof that equivalence classes form a partition.

Show the path as a graph
Element, definition, no evidence levelElementdefinitionGroup, concept, no evidence levelGroupconceptProposition, concept, no evidence levelPropositionconceptSet, definition, no evidence levelSetdefinitionGroup homomorphism, definition, no evidence levelGroup homomorphismdefinitionSymmetric group, definition, no evidence levelSymmetric groupdefinitionConjunction, definition, no evidence levelConjunctiondefinitionDisjunction, definition, no evidence levelDisjunctiondefinitionImplication, definition, no evidence levelImplicationdefinitionPredicate, definition, no evidence levelPredicatedefinitionEmpty set, object, no evidence levelEmpty setobjectFamily of sets, definition, no evidence levelFamily of setsdefinitionOrdered pair, definition, no evidence levelOrdered pairdefinitionIntersection, definition, no evidence levelIntersectiondefinitionGroup action, definition, no evidence levelGroup actiondefinitionUnion, definition, no evidence levelUniondefinitionSet-builder notation, concept, no evidence levelSet-builder notationconceptBiconditional, definition, no evidence levelBiconditionaldefinitionExistential quantifier, definition, no evidence levelExistential quantifierdefinitionUniversal quantifier, definition, no evidence levelUniversal quantifierdefinitionDisjoint sets, definition, no evidence levelDisjoint setsdefinitionCartesian product, definition, no evidence levelCartesian productdefinitionSubset, definition, no evidence levelSubsetdefinitionAxiom of extensionality, statement, no evidence levelAxiom of extensionali…statementOrbit, definition, no evidence levelOrbitdefinitionUnion of a family of sets, definition, no evidence levelUnion of a family of …definitionBinary relation, definition, no evidence levelBinary relationdefinitionPartition of a set, definition, no evidence levelPartition of a setdefinitionReflexive relation, definition, no evidence levelReflexive relationdefinitionSymmetric relation, definition, no evidence levelSymmetric relationdefinitionTransitive relation, definition, no evidence levelTransitive relationdefinitionEquivalence relation, definition, no evidence levelEquivalence relationdefinitionEquivalence class, definition, no evidence levelEquivalence classdefinitionProof that equivalence classes form a partition, proof, no evidence levelProof that equivalenc…proofEquivalence classes form a partition, statement, no evidence levelEquivalence classes f…statementProof that orbits partition the set, proof, no evidence levelProof that orbits par…proof
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Element definition
  2. Group concept
  3. Proposition concept
  4. Set definition
  5. Group homomorphism definition
  6. Symmetric group definition
  7. Conjunction definition
  8. Disjunction definition
  9. Implication definition
  10. Predicate definition
  11. Empty set object
  12. Family of sets definition
  13. Ordered pair definition
  14. Intersection definition
  15. Group action definition
  16. Union definition
  17. Set-builder notation concept
  18. Biconditional definition
  19. Existential quantifier definition
  20. Universal quantifier definition
  21. Disjoint sets definition
  22. Cartesian product definition
  23. Subset definition
  24. Axiom of extensionality statement
  25. Orbit definition
  26. Union of a family of sets definition
  27. Binary relation definition
  28. Partition of a set definition
  29. Reflexive relation definition
  30. Symmetric relation definition
  31. Transitive relation definition
  32. Equivalence relation definition
  33. Equivalence class definition
  34. Proof that equivalence classes form a partition proof
  35. Equivalence classes form a partition statement
  36. Proof that orbits partition the set proof

Where this leads

45 pages build on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_action, Orbits and stabilizers
About this page
TagZ9M4Y5MVNT
URIm2://Z9M4Y5MVNT
Kindproof
WritingW0 stub
MSC20B05
ProvesOrbits partition the set
UsesGroup action, Orbit, Equivalence relation, Equivalence class, Equivalence classes form a partition
Changed4 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.