Group theory and generalizations Proof
Proof that orbits partition the set
Builds on Group actionOrbitEquivalence relationEquivalence classEquivalence classes form a partition
Proof
We check the three axioms of an equivalence relation, then identify the classes. Let be the identity of .
- Reflexivity. By the first axiom of an action, . So for each .
- Symmetry. Let , so for some . By the two axioms of an action, .
- So with , and .
- Transitivity. Let and , so and with . By the second axiom, .
- Since , we get . By steps 1 to 4, is an equivalence relation on .
- The equivalence class of is . This is the orbit . So the equivalence classes are exactly the orbits.
- The equivalence classes form a partition of . So each point of lies in exactly one orbit.
Idea
The group axioms are exactly what is needed: the identity gives reflexivity, inverses give symmetry, and closure under products gives transitivity. Equivalence classes always partition a set, so the orbits do too.
Reading path
To understand this page from the ground up, read these 36 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proof Proof that equivalence classes form a partition.
Show the path as a graph
- no evidence level
- Element definition
- Group concept
- Proposition concept
- Set definition
- Group homomorphism definition
- Symmetric group definition
- Conjunction definition
- Disjunction definition
- Implication definition
- Predicate definition
- Empty set object
- Family of sets definition
- Ordered pair definition
- Intersection definition
- Group action definition
- Union definition
- Set-builder notation concept
- Biconditional definition
- Existential quantifier definition
- Universal quantifier definition
- Disjoint sets definition
- Cartesian product definition
- Subset definition
- Axiom of extensionality statement
- Orbit definition
- Union of a family of sets definition
- Binary relation definition
- Partition of a set definition
- Reflexive relation definition
- Symmetric relation definition
- Transitive relation definition
- Equivalence relation definition
- Equivalence class definition
- Proof that equivalence classes form a partition proof
- Equivalence classes form a partition statement
- Proof that orbits partition the set proof
Where this leads
45 pages build on this one.
- A finite group is nilpotent iff it is the product of its Sylow subgroups
- Finite p-groups are nilpotent
- Class equation
- Fixed points of a p-group action
- Second Sylow theorem
- Groups of order p squared are abelian
- The number of Sylow subgroups is the index of the normaliser
- Abelian simple groups have prime order
- Cauchy's theorem
- The number of Sylow subgroups divides the index
- Conjugacy class
- Third Sylow theorem
- Frattini argument
- Wedderburn's little theorem
- A nontrivial finite p-group has nontrivial centre
- First Sylow theorem
- Size of a conjugacy class is the index of the centraliser
- Gauss–Wantzel theorem
- Groups of order pq
- Burnside's lemma
- Orbits partition the set
- Proof of Wedderburn's little theorem by the class equation and cyclotomic polynomials
- Proof that the number of Sylow subgroups is the index of the normaliser
- Proof of the first Sylow theorem by induction with the class equation
- Galois group of a prime degree polynomial with two nonreal roots
- Proof that finite p-groups are nilpotent
- Proof that a nontrivial finite p-group has nontrivial centre by the class equation
- Proof of the second Sylow theorem
- Finite Desarguesian planes are Pappian
- Hall's theorem on solvable groups
- Proof of the third Sylow theorem
- Proof of Cauchy's theorem by McKay's counting argument
- Hall subgroup
- Sylow theorems
- Frattini subgroup
- Proof that groups of order p squared are abelian
- Proof that the size of a conjugacy class is the index of the centraliser
- Proof of the Frattini argument
- Proof that the number of Sylow subgroups divides the index
- Proof that a finite group is nilpotent iff it is the product of its Sylow subgroups
- Veblen–Young theorem
- Proof of the class equation
- Proof of Burnside's lemma by double counting
- Proof of the Gauss–Wantzel theorem
- Proof of the fixed point congruence for p-group actions
Further reading
- Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_action, Orbits and stabilizers
About this page
| Tag | Z9M4Y5MVNT |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://Z9M4Y5MVNT |
| Kind | proof |
| Writing | W0 stub |
| MSC | 20B05 |
| Proves | Orbits partition the set |
| Uses | Group action, Orbit, Equivalence relation, Equivalence class, Equivalence classes form a partition |
| Changed | 4 November 2026 |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.