Math 2.0

Mathematical logic and foundations Proof

Proof that equivalence classes form a partition

Builds on Equivalence relationEquivalence classPartition of a setDisjoint setsAxiom of extensionality

Proof

We check the three properties of a partition.

  1. Let ∼\sim be an equivalence relation on a set AA. For a∈Aa \in A, the equivalence class of aa is [a]={x∈A∣x∼a}[a] = \set{x \in A \mid x \sim a}. Let P={[a]∣a∈A}P = \set{[a] \mid a \in A}.
  2. Each [a][a] is a subset of AA by its definition. So PP is a set of subsets of AA.
  3. Let a∈Aa \in A. By reflexivity, a∼aa \sim a, so a∈[a]a \in [a]. Hence each block [a][a] is nonempty.
  4. By step 2, the union of the blocks is contained in AA. By step 3, each a∈Aa \in A lies in the block [a][a]. So the union of the blocks is AA.
  5. Let a,b∈Aa, b \in A and suppose that some cc lies in [a]∩[b][a] \cap [b]. Then c∼ac \sim a and c∼bc \sim b.
  6. In step 5, let x∈[a]x \in [a], so x∼ax \sim a. By symmetry, a∼ca \sim c. By transitivity, x∼ax \sim a and a∼ca \sim c give x∼cx \sim c.
  7. By transitivity again, x∼cx \sim c and c∼bc \sim b give x∼bx \sim b, so x∈[b]x \in [b]. Hence [a]⊆[b][a] \subseteq [b].
  8. Exchanging the roles of aa and bb in steps 6 and 7 gives [b]⊆[a][b] \subseteq [a]. So [a][a] and [b][b] have the same elements, and [a]=[b][a] = [b] by the axiom of extensionality.
  9. By steps 5 to 8, two blocks with a common element are equal. So two different blocks have no common element. Thus the blocks are pairwise disjoint.
  10. By steps 3, 4 and 9, the blocks are nonempty, pairwise disjoint, and their union is AA. So PP is a partition of AA.

Idea

Reflexivity puts each element in its own class, so the classes are nonempty and cover AA. Symmetry and transitivity show that two classes sharing one element have exactly the same elements. So distinct classes cannot overlap.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 29 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Element, definition, no evidence levelElementdefinitionProposition, concept, no evidence levelPropositionconceptSet, definition, no evidence levelSetdefinitionConjunction, definition, no evidence levelConjunctiondefinitionDisjunction, definition, no evidence levelDisjunctiondefinitionImplication, definition, no evidence levelImplicationdefinitionPredicate, definition, no evidence levelPredicatedefinitionEmpty set, object, no evidence levelEmpty setobjectFamily of sets, definition, no evidence levelFamily of setsdefinitionOrdered pair, definition, no evidence levelOrdered pairdefinitionIntersection, definition, no evidence levelIntersectiondefinitionUnion, definition, no evidence levelUniondefinitionBiconditional, definition, no evidence levelBiconditionaldefinitionSet-builder notation, concept, no evidence levelSet-builder notationconceptExistential quantifier, definition, no evidence levelExistential quantifierdefinitionUniversal quantifier, definition, no evidence levelUniversal quantifierdefinitionDisjoint sets, definition, no evidence levelDisjoint setsdefinitionCartesian product, definition, no evidence levelCartesian productdefinitionSubset, definition, no evidence levelSubsetdefinitionAxiom of extensionality, statement, no evidence levelAxiom of extensionali…statementUnion of a family of sets, definition, no evidence levelUnion of a family of …definitionBinary relation, definition, no evidence levelBinary relationdefinitionPartition of a set, definition, no evidence levelPartition of a setdefinitionReflexive relation, definition, no evidence levelReflexive relationdefinitionSymmetric relation, definition, no evidence levelSymmetric relationdefinitionTransitive relation, definition, no evidence levelTransitive relationdefinitionEquivalence relation, definition, no evidence levelEquivalence relationdefinitionEquivalence class, definition, no evidence levelEquivalence classdefinitionProof that equivalence classes form a partition, proof, no evidence levelProof that equivalenc…proof
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Element definition
  2. Proposition concept
  3. Set definition
  4. Conjunction definition
  5. Disjunction definition
  6. Implication definition
  7. Predicate definition
  8. Empty set object
  9. Family of sets definition
  10. Ordered pair definition
  11. Intersection definition
  12. Union definition
  13. Biconditional definition
  14. Set-builder notation concept
  15. Existential quantifier definition
  16. Universal quantifier definition
  17. Disjoint sets definition
  18. Cartesian product definition
  19. Subset definition
  20. Axiom of extensionality statement
  21. Union of a family of sets definition
  22. Binary relation definition
  23. Partition of a set definition
  24. Reflexive relation definition
  25. Symmetric relation definition
  26. Transitive relation definition
  27. Equivalence relation definition
  28. Equivalence class definition
  29. Proof that equivalence classes form a partition proof

Where this leads

381 pages build on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Fundamental_Theorem_on_Equivalence_Relations
About this page
Tag5MWD3ZXDVR
URIm2://5MWD3ZXDVR
Kindproof
WritingW0 stub
MSC03E20
ProvesEquivalence classes form a partition
UsesEquivalence relation, Equivalence class, Partition of a set, Disjoint sets, Axiom of extensionality
Changed4 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.