Linear and multilinear algebra; matrix theory Proof
Proof of the Cholesky decomposition by induction on the size
Builds on Positive definite matrixHermitian matrixLower triangular matrixUpper triangular matrixConjugate transposeTranspose of a productDeterminant of a triangular matrixA square matrix is invertible iff its determinant is nonzeroExistence of square roots of nonnegative reals
Proof
We prove existence by induction on , then uniqueness, then the real case. Here is the conjugate transpose.
- For matrices and with defined, . This is the transpose of a product with all entries conjugated.
- For , and by positive definiteness. By the existence of square roots, works.
- Let and assume existence for size . Since is Hermitian, with of size , and .
- The block is Hermitian. For with , let . Then . So is positive definite.
- By the induction hypothesis, with lower triangular and with positive diagonal entries.
- By the determinant of a triangular matrix, is the product of these entries, so it is nonzero. So is invertible, and so is .
- Let and . Let be followed by the entry , so .
- We have . Expanding in blocks gives .
- By step 1, . So .
- By steps 7 to 9, equals . So is a positive real number.
- Let , and let . It is lower triangular with positive diagonal entries.
- Block multiplication gives .
- By steps 5, 7, 9 and 10, this equals . This completes the induction.
- For uniqueness we need a lemma. Let be an invertible lower triangular matrix with entries . As in step 6, for all .
- Fix and let be column of , so . For , row reads .
- For in turn, this gives . So for , and row gives .
- So is lower triangular with diagonal entries .
- If and are lower triangular, then has nonzero terms only for . So is lower triangular with diagonal entries .
- The same argument shows that a product of upper triangular matrices is upper triangular. The conjugate transpose of a lower triangular matrix is upper triangular.
- Now let with and lower triangular with positive diagonal entries. Both are invertible, as in step 6.
- Let . By steps 17 and 18, is lower triangular with positive diagonal entries .
- From we get , so .
- By step 1, , so . By steps 17 and 19, it is upper triangular.
- By steps 19, 22 and 23, is upper triangular. It is also lower triangular, so is diagonal with positive diagonal entries .
- Then , so . Multiplying by on the left and on the right gives .
- So , and since . Hence and .
- Real case: let be real, and let be the matrix of complex conjugates of the entries of .
- Then is lower triangular with the same positive diagonal entries, and .
- By the uniqueness of steps 20 to 26, . So all entries of are real.
Idea
Split off the last row and column. The top left block has a Cholesky factor by induction, and the last row of is then forced by two equations. The only delicate point is that is positive, and it is the value at a well chosen vector .
Reading path
To understand this page from the ground up, read these 135 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proofs Proof of the decomposition of a permutation into transpositions, Proof that the symmetric group is generated by transpositions, Proof of the commutativity of addition by induction, Proof that equivalence classes form a partition, Proof that permuting rows multiplies the determinant by the sign, Proof that disjoint cycles commute, Proof that the reals form an ordered field, with the Cauchy sequence construction, Proof that a matrix with two equal rows has determinant zero, Proof of the formula for the transpose of a product, Proof of strong induction from ordinary induction, Proof of the laws of exponents in a group, Proof of the existence of square roots of nonnegative reals, Proof that an intersection of subgroups is a subgroup, Proof that the determinant of the identity matrix is one, Proof of the decomposition of a permutation into disjoint cycles, Proof of the determinant of a triangular matrix by the Leibniz formula, Proof of the well-ordering principle from strong induction, Proof of the division algorithm, Proof of the Leibniz formula from the defining properties of the determinant, Proof of the uniqueness of inverses, Proof that the determinant is multilinear in the rows, Proof of the subgroup criterion.
- Binary operation definition
- Construction of the reals from Cauchy sequences concept
- Cycle notation concept
- Definition by recursion concept
- Determinant concept
- Divisibility definition
- Element definition
- Group concept
- Identity matrix object
- Integers object
- Invertible matrix concept
- Mathematical induction concept
- Matrix definition
- Multilinear map concept
- Natural numbers object
- Ordered field definition
- Peano axioms concept
- Permutation concept
- Proposition concept
- Rational numbers object
- Real numbers object
- Set bounded above definition
- Transposition concept
- Vector space definition
- Identity element definition
- Set definition
- A square matrix is invertible iff its determinant is nonzero statement
- Subgroup definition
- Symmetric group definition
- Ring of integers statement
- Matrix multiplication definition
- Square matrix definition
- Transpose definition
- Successor function definition
- Conjunction definition
- Disjunction definition
- Implication definition
- Predicate definition
- The reals form a field statement
- Supremum definition
- Linear map definition
- Inverse element definition
- Empty set object
- Family of sets definition
- Ordered pair definition
- Transposition definition
- Proof that an intersection of subgroups is a subgroup proof
- Intersection definition
- Union definition
- Lower triangular matrix definition
- Proof of the formula for the transpose of a product proof
- Set-builder notation concept
- Upper triangular matrix definition
- Symmetric matrix definition
- Conjugate transpose definition
- Addition of natural numbers definition
- Biconditional definition
- The rationals form a field statement
- The successor function is injective statement
- Zero is not a successor statement
- Existential quantifier definition
- Universal quantifier definition
- Multilinear map definition
- Completeness axiom statement
- Cartesian product definition
- Disjoint sets definition
- Proof of the uniqueness of inverses proof
- Transpose of a product statement
- Union of a family of sets definition
- Subset definition
- Hermitian matrix definition
- Axiom of extensionality statement
- Proof of the commutativity of addition by induction proof
- Order on the natural numbers definition
- The rationals form an ordered field statement
- Uniqueness quantifier definition
- Alternating multilinear map definition
- Binary relation definition
- Uniqueness of inverses statement
- Partition of a set definition
- Order on the reals definition
- Determinant definition
- Positive definite matrix definition
- Commutativity of addition statement
- Proof of strong induction from ordinary induction proof
- Antisymmetric relation definition
- Reflexive relation definition
- Symmetric relation definition
- Transitive relation definition
- Proof of the subgroup criterion proof
- Proof of the laws of exponents in a group proof
- Proof that a matrix with two equal rows has determinant zero proof
- Function definition
- Proof that the determinant of the identity matrix is one proof
- Proof that the determinant is multilinear in the rows proof
- Strong induction statement
- Equivalence relation definition
- Preorder definition
- Subgroup criterion statement
- Determinant of a matrix with two equal rows statement
- Laws of exponents in a group statement
- Determinant is multilinear in the rows statement
- Determinant of the identity matrix statement
- Injective function definition
- Proof of the well-ordering principle from strong induction proof
- Partial order definition
- Intersection of subgroups is a subgroup statement
- Proof that disjoint cycles commute proof
- Equivalence class definition
- Well-ordering principle statement
- Total order definition
- Subgroup generated by a subset definition
- Proof that equivalence classes form a partition proof
- Disjoint cycles commute statement
- Proof of the division algorithm proof
- Equivalence classes form a partition statement
- Division algorithm statement
- Proof that the reals form an ordered field, with the Cauchy sequence construction proof
- Proof of the decomposition of a permutation into disjoint cycles proof
- The reals form an ordered field statement
- Decomposition of a permutation into disjoint cycles statement
- Proof of the existence of square roots of nonnegative reals proof
- Proof of the decomposition of a permutation into transpositions proof
- Existence of square roots of nonnegative reals statement
- Decomposition of a permutation into transpositions statement
- Sign of a permutation definition
- Proof that the symmetric group is generated by transpositions proof
- The symmetric group is generated by transpositions statement
- Proof that permuting rows multiplies the determinant by the sign proof
- Permuting rows multiplies the determinant by the sign statement
- Proof of the Leibniz formula from the defining properties of the determinant proof
- Leibniz formula for determinants statement
- Proof of the determinant of a triangular matrix by the Leibniz formula proof
- Determinant of a triangular matrix statement
- Proof of the Cholesky decomposition by induction on the size proof
Where this leads
6 pages build on this one.
Further reading
About this page
| Tag | NRPFJZNDZ6 |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://NRPFJZNDZ6 |
| Kind | proof |
| Writing | W0 stub |
| MSC | 15A23, 65F05 |
| Proves | Cholesky decomposition |
| Uses | Positive definite matrix, Hermitian matrix, Lower triangular matrix, Upper triangular matrix, Conjugate transpose, Transpose of a product, Determinant of a triangular matrix, A square matrix is invertible iff its determinant is nonzero, Existence of square roots of nonnegative reals |
| Changed | 4 November 2026 |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
- a source with a locator (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.