Group theory and generalizations Proof
Proof of the sign of a cycle
Builds on Sign of a permutationCycle notationTranspositionSymmetric group
Proof
We write the cycle as a product of transpositions. Products in are composites of maps, so the right factor acts first. The sign needs .
- Let in cycle notation, with distinct. So for , , and fixes all other points.
- Case . Then is the identity . Since is a product of two transpositions, the definition of the sign gives .
- Case . Let . This is a product of transpositions. We show .
- A point outside is fixed by each factor, so .
- The point goes first to under . The later factors with fix . So .
- Let . The factors with fix . Then sends to , and sends to .
- The factors with fix . So .
- The point is fixed by all factors except the last one applied, , which sends it to . So .
- By steps 4 to 8, and agree at every point, so is a product of transpositions.
- By the definition of the sign, . With step 2, this holds for every .
Idea
A -cycle can be built by swapping the first entry successively with the second, third, and so on up to the last. That uses swaps, so the sign is . In particular, cycles of odd length are even permutations.
Reading path
To understand this page from the ground up, read these 70 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proofs Proof of the decomposition of a permutation into transpositions, Proof of the commutativity of addition by induction, Proof that equivalence classes form a partition, Proof that disjoint cycles commute, Proof of strong induction from ordinary induction, Proof of the laws of exponents in a group, Proof of the decomposition of a permutation into disjoint cycles, Proof of the well-ordering principle from strong induction, Proof of the division algorithm, Proof of the uniqueness of inverses.
- Binary operation definition
- Cycle notation concept
- Definition by recursion concept
- Divisibility definition
- Element definition
- Group concept
- Mathematical induction concept
- Natural numbers object
- Peano axioms concept
- Proposition concept
- Identity element definition
- Set definition
- Symmetric group definition
- Successor function definition
- Conjunction definition
- Disjunction definition
- Implication definition
- Predicate definition
- Inverse element definition
- Empty set object
- Family of sets definition
- Ordered pair definition
- Transposition definition
- Intersection definition
- Union definition
- Addition of natural numbers definition
- Set-builder notation concept
- Biconditional definition
- The successor function is injective statement
- Zero is not a successor statement
- Existential quantifier definition
- Universal quantifier definition
- Proof of the uniqueness of inverses proof
- Cartesian product definition
- Disjoint sets definition
- Proof of the commutativity of addition by induction proof
- Subset definition
- Union of a family of sets definition
- Axiom of extensionality statement
- Order on the natural numbers definition
- Uniqueness quantifier definition
- Uniqueness of inverses statement
- Binary relation definition
- Partition of a set definition
- Commutativity of addition statement
- Proof of strong induction from ordinary induction proof
- Reflexive relation definition
- Symmetric relation definition
- Transitive relation definition
- Proof of the laws of exponents in a group proof
- Function definition
- Strong induction statement
- Equivalence relation definition
- Injective function definition
- Laws of exponents in a group statement
- Proof of the well-ordering principle from strong induction proof
- Proof that disjoint cycles commute proof
- Equivalence class definition
- Well-ordering principle statement
- Disjoint cycles commute statement
- Proof of the division algorithm proof
- Proof that equivalence classes form a partition proof
- Equivalence classes form a partition statement
- Division algorithm statement
- Proof of the decomposition of a permutation into disjoint cycles proof
- Decomposition of a permutation into disjoint cycles statement
- Proof of the decomposition of a permutation into transpositions proof
- Decomposition of a permutation into transpositions statement
- Sign of a permutation definition
- Proof of the sign of a cycle proof
Where this leads
205 pages build on this one.
- Singular value decomposition
- Change of variables in multiple integrals
- Lotka–Volterra equations
- Volume of a ball in R^n
- Triangularisation
- A matrix is invertible iff its determinant is a unit
- Lagrange multiplier with one constraint
- Spectral theorem for normal matrices
- Product of a matrix and its adjugate
- Eigenvalues are the roots of the characteristic polynomial
- Scalar triple product
- Jacobian of spherical coordinates
- Laplace expansion along a column
- Spectral theorem
- Existence of an eigenvalue over an algebraically closed field
- Minimal polynomial divides the characteristic polynomial
- Cramer's rule
- Linearisation at an equilibrium
- Determinant of a matrix exponential
- Simplicity of the alternating group
- Implicit function theorem
- Laplace expansion along a row
- Hyperbolic equilibrium point
- Spectral theorem for Hermitian matrices
- Inverse in terms of the adjugate
- Cayley–Hamilton theorem
- Cylindrical coordinates
- The alternating group A5 is simple
- Polar decomposition
- The symmetric group on five or more letters is not solvable
- Inverse function theorem
- The alternating group is generated by three-cycles
- Wronskian test for linear independence of solutions
- Classification of equilibria of planar linear systems
- Implicit function theorem for a surjective derivative
- Vandermonde determinant
- Principal axis theorem
- Cayley–Hamilton theorem for linear maps
- Implicit differentiation
- Polar coordinates
- Spherical coordinates
- Variation of constants formula for linear systems
- Hartman–Grobman theorem
- Pendulum equation
- Stability of linear systems via eigenvalues
- Integration in polar coordinates
- Sign of a cycle
- Lagrange multipliers
- Sylvester's criterion
- Volume of a ball in R^3
- Diffeomorphism
- Decomposition into generalised eigenspaces
- Local homeomorphism from the inverse function theorem
- Morse–Smale system
- Abel–Ruffini theorem
- Spectral theorem for unbounded self-adjoint operators
- Proof of the Lagrange multiplier rule with one constraint
- Routh–Hurwitz theorem
- Proof of the principal axis theorem from the spectral theorem
- Hautus lemma
- Holomorphic inverse function theorem
- Proof of the implicit function theorem for a surjective derivative
- Proof of the singular value decomposition from the spectral theorem
- Jacobi's formula
- Proof of the implicit function theorem from the inverse function theorem
- Quantum Zeno effect
- Hilbert–Schmidt expansion theorem
- Proof of the Laplace expansion along a column by transposition
- Duality of controllability and observability
- Markov partition
- Augmented Lagrangian method
- Minimal realization
- Proof of Cramer's rule by the adjugate
- Proof that the scalar triple product is a determinant
- Anharmonic oscillator
- Proof of Sylvester's criterion by induction and completing the square
- Proof of the Wronskian test for linear independence of solutions
- Volterra's principle
- Bilinear series of a symmetric kernel
- Choquet-Bruhat–Geroch theorem on maximal developments
- Proof of the Lagrange multiplier theorem by the implicit function theorem
- Spectral decomposition theorem
- Black hole stability problem
- Mason's gain formula
- Central polynomial
- Box–Muller transform
- Kaplansky's theorem on PI rings
- Proof that a matrix is invertible iff its determinant is a unit
- Uhlmann's theorem
- Kalman rank condition
- Marshallian demand function
- Proof that a C^1 map with invertible derivative is a local homeomorphism and an open map
- Nash–Moser theorem
- Spectral theorem for compact self-adjoint operators
- Courant–Fischer characterization of characteristic values
- Utility maximization problem
- Proof of the spectral theorem for self-adjoint operators by induction on the dimension
- Proof of the Laplace expansion along a row by the Leibniz formula
- Principle of material frame-indifference
- Detectability
- Mixed state
- Implicit function theorem in Banach spaces
- Melnikov method
- Strong cosmic censorship conjecture
- Euler's elastica
- Lyapunov–Schmidt reduction
- Purification of a quantum state
- Gleason's theorem
- Weak cosmic censorship conjecture
- Numerical continuation
- Proof that the alternating group is generated by three-cycles
- Proof of the inverse in terms of the adjugate
- Proof of the eigenvalue criteria for stability of linear systems via the Jordan normal form
- Inverted pendulum
- Schur polynomial
- Stone's theorem on one-parameter unitary groups
- Closing lemma
- Sequential quadratic programming
- Kalman decomposition
- Anosov flow
- Lidskii's trace formula for integral operators
- Hamiltonian operator
- Second quantization
- Differential-algebraic system of equations
- Proof of the decomposition into generalised eigenspaces
- Smale's problems on dynamics
- Controllability Gramian
- Posner's theorem
- Controllable canonical form
- Spectrum of the Laplace–Beltrami operator
- Backus–Gilbert method
- Principal stresses
- Furuta pendulum
- Topological quantum field theory
- Smooth dynamical system
- Brunovsky normal form
- Proof of the simplicity of the alternating group by three-cycles
- Wick rotation
- Eckart–Young theorem
- Balanced truncation
- Ackermann's formula
- Proof of the existence of an eigenvalue over an algebraically closed field
- Strang splitting
- Proof of the variation of constants formula for linear systems
- Zermelo's navigation problem
- Lie–Trotter product formula
- Routh–Hurwitz stability criterion
- Regular value theorem
- Inverse function theorem in Banach spaces
- Proof of the inverse function theorem by the contraction mapping principle
- Kharitonov's theorem
- Proof of the polar decomposition from the singular value decomposition
- Born rule
- Borel functional calculus
- Configuration space
- Schmidt decomposition
- Hyperbolic set
- Operator monotone function
- Proof of the spectral theorem for normal matrices by deflation
- Mercer's theorem
- Proof of the spectral theorem for Hermitian matrices
- Lagrange multipliers for constraints
- Proof that the minimal polynomial divides the characteristic polynomial
- Proof of triangularisation by induction on the size
- Proof of the product of a matrix and its adjugate by Laplace expansion
- Anharmonic oscillator
- Proof of the volume of a ball in R^3 from the n-dimensional formula
- Generalized Lotka–Volterra equation
- Quantum computing
- Wave function collapse
- Principal component analysis
- Proof of the Cayley–Hamilton theorem for linear maps
- Quintic equation
- Axiom A
- Inertia tensor and principal axes
- Bidiagonalization
- Pole placement theorem
- Duffing equation
- Kapitza's pendulum
- Liénard–Chipart criterion
- Indirect utility function
- Proof of the Vandermonde determinant by column operations
- Schur product theorem
- Singular values of a compact operator
- Spherical pendulum
- Observable
- Slice theorem
- Schmidt's singular value decomposition of a kernel
- Proof that the determinant of a matrix exponential is the exponential of the trace
- Proof that the eigenvalues are the roots of the characteristic polynomial
- Van der Pol oscillator
- Polar decomposition of the deformation gradient
- Anosov diffeomorphism
- Spectral theorem for bounded normal operators
- Adjoint state method
- Stability conjecture
- Proof that the symmetric group on five or more letters is not solvable
- Hidden-variable theory
- Channel capacity of a quantum channel
- Stabilizability
- Gain scheduling
- Proof of the Cayley–Hamilton theorem with the adjugate
- Amitsur–Levitzki theorem
- Time-optimal control
- Normal form
Further reading
About this page
| Tag | RDV9V3XDX5 |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://RDV9V3XDX5 |
| Kind | proof |
| Writing | W0 stub |
| MSC | 20B30 |
| Proves | Sign of a cycle |
| Uses | Sign of a permutation, Cycle notation, Transposition, Symmetric group |
| Changed | 4 November 2026 |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.