Proof of the recurrence for Stirling numbers of the first kind
Builds on Stirling numbers of the first kindPermutationDecomposition of a permutation into disjoint cyclesRule of sumBijection principle
Proof
We remove the last element from its cycle and count each case by a bijection.
- Let be a permutation of a finite set . For , the cycle of through is the set .
- By the decomposition into disjoint cycles, these sets are the moved sets of the cycles of , together with the singletons of fixed points. They partition , and their number is the number of cycles of in the definition of the Stirling numbers of the first kind.
- If lies in a cycle with elements, then are its elements, all distinct, and .
- Let and be natural numbers. Let , let , and let . We count the permutations of with cycles.
- Case . Then is a cycle, and restricts to a permutation of . Its cycles are the other cycles of .
- Conversely, a permutation of with cycles, extended by , gives such a . These maps are inverse to each other, so this case has permutations.
- Case . Let , so . Define by and for .
- The map is a bijection of . Indeed, maps onto , and supplies the missing value.
- Let be the cycle of through , with elements. Write for . Since , , and because .
- For , , so . Also .
- So is a cycle of , with elements.
- Any other cycle of avoids and , since . On the maps and agree, so is also a cycle of .
- The sets of steps 11 and 12 partition , so they are all the cycles of . Hence has as many cycles as , namely .
- Map to the pair , where is a permutation of with cycles and .
- Conversely, let be a permutation of with cycles, and let . Define on by , , and for the other .
- This is a permutation of , because maps onto . Also and . Applying step 7 to it gives back , because . So by step 13, has cycles.
- Starting from , step 15 applied to gives back , since and . So the maps of steps 14 and 15 are inverse to each other.
- By the bijection principle and the rule of sum over the choices of , this case has permutations.
- The two cases are disjoint and cover all permutations of with cycles. By the rule of sum,
Idea
Delete from the permutation: if is a fixed point, one cycle disappears. Otherwise, link the element before directly to the element after , which keeps the number of cycles. This element before can be any of the other elements, which gives the factor .
Reading path
To understand this page from the ground up, read these 86 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proofs Proof of the commutativity of addition by induction, Proof that equivalence classes form a partition, Proof that a composition of injections is injective, Proof that disjoint cycles commute, Proof that a function is bijective iff it has a two-sided inverse, Proof of strong induction from ordinary induction, Proof of the laws of exponents in a group, Proof that a composition of surjections is surjective, Proof of the decomposition of a permutation into disjoint cycles, Proof of the rule of sum, Proof of the well-ordering principle from strong induction, Proof of the division algorithm, Proof of the uniqueness of inverses, Proof of the bijection principle.
- Binary operation definition
- Cardinality of a finite set definition
- Cycle notation concept
- Definition by recursion concept
- Divisibility definition
- Element definition
- Group concept
- Mathematical induction concept
- Natural numbers object
- Peano axioms concept
- Permutation definition
- Proposition concept
- Identity element definition
- Set definition
- Symmetric group definition
- Successor function definition
- Stirling numbers of the first kind definition
- Conjunction definition
- Disjunction definition
- Implication definition
- Predicate definition
- Inverse element definition
- Empty set object
- Family of sets definition
- Ordered pair definition
- Intersection definition
- Union definition
- Set-builder notation concept
- Addition of natural numbers definition
- Biconditional definition
- The successor function is injective statement
- Zero is not a successor statement
- Existential quantifier definition
- Universal quantifier definition
- Disjoint sets definition
- Cartesian product definition
- Proof of the uniqueness of inverses proof
- Proof of the commutativity of addition by induction proof
- Union of a family of sets definition
- Subset definition
- Axiom of extensionality statement
- Order on the natural numbers definition
- Uniqueness quantifier definition
- Uniqueness of inverses statement
- Binary relation definition
- Partition of a set definition
- Commutativity of addition statement
- Proof of strong induction from ordinary induction proof
- Reflexive relation definition
- Symmetric relation definition
- Transitive relation definition
- Proof of the laws of exponents in a group proof
- Function definition
- Strong induction statement
- Equivalence relation definition
- Codomain definition
- Function composition definition
- Identity function definition
- Injective function definition
- Laws of exponents in a group statement
- Proof of the well-ordering principle from strong induction proof
- Proof that disjoint cycles commute proof
- Left inverse definition
- Right inverse definition
- Surjective function definition
- Equivalence class definition
- Proof that a composition of injections is injective proof
- Well-ordering principle statement
- Disjoint cycles commute statement
- Proof that equivalence classes form a partition proof
- Proof that a composition of surjections is surjective proof
- Bijective function definition
- Composition of injections is injective statement
- Proof of the division algorithm proof
- Proof of the rule of sum proof
- Composition of surjections is surjective statement
- Equivalence classes form a partition statement
- Proof that a function is bijective iff it has a two-sided inverse proof
- Division algorithm statement
- Rule of sum statement
- Bijective iff it has a two-sided inverse statement
- Proof of the decomposition of a permutation into disjoint cycles proof
- Decomposition of a permutation into disjoint cycles statement
- Proof of the bijection principle proof
- Bijection principle statement
- Proof of the recurrence for Stirling numbers of the first kind proof
Where this leads
1 page builds on this one.
Further reading
- Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stirling_numbers_of_the_first_kind, Recurrence relation
About this page
| Tag | TFWBM9VE3V |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://TFWBM9VE3V |
| Kind | proof |
| Writing | W0 stub |
| MSC | 11B73 |
| Proves | Recurrence for Stirling numbers of the first kind |
| Uses | Stirling numbers of the first kind, Permutation, Decomposition of a permutation into disjoint cycles, Rule of sum, Bijection principle |
| Changed | 4 November 2026 |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.