Math 2.0

Sequences, series, summability Proof

Proof of the comparison test for improper integrals

Builds on Improper integralLimit at infinityAdditivity of the integral over intervalsMonotonicity of the integralLinearity of the integralSupremumCompleteness axiomApproximation property of the supremum

Proof

We show that b↦∫abfb \mapsto \int_a^b f is increasing and bounded, so it has a limit by the completeness of ℝ\R.

  1. For b>ab > a, let F(b)=∫abf(x) dxF(b) = \int_a^b f(x) \, dx and G(b)=∫abg(x) dxG(b) = \int_a^b g(x) \, dx. They exist by hypothesis.
  2. If h ⁣:[c,d]→ℝh \colon [c, d] \to \R is Riemann integrable with h≥0h \ge 0, then ∫cdh≥0\int_c^d h \ge 0. Indeed, the linearity of the integral gives ∫cd0 dx=0⋅∫cdh=0\int_c^d 0 \, dx = 0 \cdot \int_c^d h = 0. Then the monotonicity of the integral gives ∫cdh≥0\int_c^d h \ge 0.
  3. FF is increasing. Let a<b<b′a < b < b'. By the additivity over intervals, F(b′)=F(b)+∫bb′fF(b') = F(b) + \int_b^{b'} f. By step 2 and f≥0f \ge 0, F(b′)≥F(b)F(b') \ge F(b). In the same way, GG is increasing.
  4. For b>ab > a, F(b)≤G(b)F(b) \le G(b), by the monotonicity of the integral and f≤gf \le g on [a,b][a, b].
  5. Now assume that ∫a∞g\int_a^\infty g converges. By the definition of the improper integral, G(b)→LG(b) \to L as b→∞b \to \infty, where L=∫a∞g(x) dxL = \int_a^\infty g(x) \, dx.
  6. Claim: G(b)≤LG(b) \le L for all b>ab > a. Suppose that G(b0)>LG(b_0) > L for some b0>ab_0 > a, and let ε=G(b0)−L>0\varepsilon = G(b_0) - L > 0.
  7. By the definition of the limit at infinity, there is MM with ∣G(b)−L∣<ε\abs{G(b) - L} < \varepsilon for all b>Mb > M.
  8. Take b>max⁡(M,b0)b > \max(M, b_0). By step 3, G(b)≥G(b0)=L+εG(b) \ge G(b_0) = L + \varepsilon. So G(b)−L≥εG(b) - L \ge \varepsilon, which contradicts step 7. This proves the claim.
  9. By steps 4 and 6, F(b)≤LF(b) \le L for all b>ab > a. So the set S={F(b):b>a}S = \set{F(b) : b > a} is nonempty and bounded above by LL.
  10. Let ss be the supremum of SS. It exists by the completeness axiom. Since LL is an upper bound of SS, s≤Ls \le L.
  11. Claim: F(b)→sF(b) \to s as b→∞b \to \infty. Let ε>0\varepsilon > 0. By the approximation property of the supremum, there is b1>ab_1 > a with s−ε<F(b1)≤ss - \varepsilon < F(b_1) \le s.
  12. For b>b1b > b_1, step 3 and the definition of ss give s−ε<F(b1)≤F(b)≤ss - \varepsilon < F(b_1) \le F(b) \le s. So ∣F(b)−s∣<ε\abs{F(b) - s} < \varepsilon for all b>b1b > b_1, which proves the claim.
  13. By step 11, ∫a∞f(x) dx\int_a^\infty f(x) \, dx converges and equals ss. By step 10, ∫a∞f(x) dx=s≤L=∫a∞g(x) dx\int_a^\infty f(x) \, dx = s \le L = \int_a^\infty g(x) \, dx.
  14. Finally, assume that ∫a∞f\int_a^\infty f diverges. If ∫a∞g\int_a^\infty g converged, then steps 5 to 13 would show that ∫a∞f\int_a^\infty f converges. So ∫a∞g\int_a^\infty g diverges.

Idea

For a nonnegative function, the integral up to bb can only grow as bb grows. If it stays below a fixed bound, it must settle at its supremum, by the completeness of the real numbers. The convergent integral of the larger function provides this bound.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 70 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proofs Proof that Darboux and Riemann integrals agree, Proof of the approximation property of the supremum, Proof that the reals form an ordered field, with the Cauchy sequence construction, Proof that the absolute value is multiplicative, Proof of Riemann's criterion for integrability, Proof of the triangle inequality for real numbers, Proof of the linearity of the integral, Proof of the additivity of the integral over intervals, Proof that the reals are Archimedean from the completeness axiom, Proof of the monotonicity of the integral.

  1. Construction of the reals from Cauchy sequences concept
  2. Element definition
  3. Integers object
  4. Limit point of a set definition
  5. Ordered field definition
  6. Partition of an interval definition
  7. Proposition concept
  8. Rational numbers object
  9. Real numbers object
  10. Sequence definition
  11. Set bounded above definition
  12. Set definition
  13. Ring of integers statement
  14. Limit of a function definition
  15. Archimedean ordered field definition
  16. Mesh of a partition definition
  17. Refinement of a partition definition
  18. Riemann sum definition
  19. Implication definition
  20. Predicate definition
  21. The reals form a field statement
  22. Real sequence definition
  23. Infimum definition
  24. Supremum definition
  25. Ordered pair definition
  26. Limit at infinity definition
  27. One-sided limit definition
  28. The rationals form a field statement
  29. Riemann integrable function definition
  30. Universal quantifier definition
  31. Bounded sequence definition
  32. Completeness axiom statement
  33. Cartesian product definition
  34. Subset definition
  35. The rationals form an ordered field statement
  36. Riemann integral definition
  37. Upper and lower Darboux sums definition
  38. Binary relation definition
  39. Order on the reals definition
  40. Improper integral definition
  41. Definite integral definition
  42. Upper and lower Darboux integrals definition
  43. Antisymmetric relation definition
  44. Reflexive relation definition
  45. Transitive relation definition
  46. Preorder definition
  47. Partial order definition
  48. Total order definition
  49. Proof that the reals form an ordered field, with the Cauchy sequence construction proof
  50. The reals form an ordered field statement
  51. Absolute value definition
  52. Proof of the approximation property of the supremum proof
  53. Proof of the triangle inequality for real numbers proof
  54. Proof that the absolute value is multiplicative proof
  55. Approximation property of the supremum statement
  56. Triangle inequality statement
  57. Absolute value is multiplicative statement
  58. Proof that the reals are Archimedean from the completeness axiom proof
  59. Proof of the linearity of the integral proof
  60. The reals are Archimedean statement
  61. Linearity of the integral statement
  62. Proof of the monotonicity of the integral proof
  63. Proof that Darboux and Riemann integrals agree proof
  64. Darboux and Riemann integrals agree statement
  65. Monotonicity of the integral statement
  66. Proof of Riemann's criterion for integrability proof
  67. Riemann's criterion for integrability statement
  68. Proof of the additivity of the integral over intervals proof
  69. Additivity of the integral over intervals statement
  70. Proof of the comparison test for improper integrals proof

Where this leads

65 pages build on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://www.macmillanlearning.com/studentresources/highschool/mathematics/rogawskiapet2e/additional_proofs/proof_of_comparison_test_for_improper_integrals.pdf, Lemma 2 and proof of Theorem 1
About this page
TagW9T63J9RF3
URIm2://W9T63J9RF3
Kindproof
WritingW0 stub
MSC40A10
ProvesComparison test for improper integrals
UsesImproper integral, Limit at infinity, Additivity of the integral over intervals, Monotonicity of the integral, Linearity of the integral, Supremum, Completeness axiom, Approximation property of the supremum
Changed4 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.