Proof that a set is compact iff it is complete and totally bounded
Builds on Compactness via open coversTotally bounded setComplete metric spaceSubspace metricEpsilon characterisation of Cauchy sequencesConvergence of a sequence in a metric spaceOpen ballOpen balls are openMetric topologyDiameter of a setTriangle inequality for a metricThe reals are Archimedean
Proof
We prove the two directions separately. Throughout, the metric on is the subspace metric, so distances in are distances in . We test compactness of with open covers by open subsets of X.
First, let be compact. We show that is totally bounded.
- Fix a real . The open balls , for , are open in and cover . So finitely many of them cover .
- For , the triangle inequality gives . So each ball has diameter at most .
- Thus is covered by finitely many sets of diameter less than , for each . So is totally bounded.
Next, let be compact. We show that is complete.
- Let be a Cauchy sequence of points of . Suppose, for a contradiction, that it converges to no point of . Then is nonempty, since it contains .
- Let . Since does not converge to , there is such that for each some has .
- Since is Cauchy, there is with for all .
- By step 5, choose with . For each , the triangle inequality gives .
- So the ball contains no with .
- The balls , for , are open and cover . By compactness, finitely many cover , say those with centres .
- Let . The point lies in , so for some . Since , this contradicts step 8.
- Hence each Cauchy sequence in converges to a point of , and is complete.
Conversely, let be complete and totally bounded. We argue by contradiction.
- Let be open subsets of with . Call a set bad when no finite subfamily of covers . Suppose that is bad.
- A bad set is nonempty, because the empty subfamily covers .
- Claim: if is bad and , then some bad has . Indeed, total boundedness gives sets of diameter less than that cover .
- Then . If no were bad, joining finitely many finite subfamilies would cover . So some is bad, and .
- Let . For , apply step 14 to with . We get bad sets with .
- By step 13, choose for each . For , both and lie in , so .
- Let . Since the reals are Archimedean, there is with . Then for . So is Cauchy.
- Since is complete, for some . Choose with .
- The set is open in the metric topology. So there is with .
- Choose with and . This is possible by the Archimedean property and .
- Let . Then . So .
- Thus the single set covers , and is not bad. This contradicts step 16.
- So some finite subfamily of covers . By compactness via open covers, is compact.
Idea
Compactness gives finite covers by small balls, which is total boundedness. A Cauchy sequence with no limit stays away from each point, so the balls witnessing this would need infinitely many members. For the converse, a cover with no finite subcover has a "bad" piece at every scale. The bad pieces shrink to a point, and the open set around that point swallows a whole bad piece.
Reading path
To understand this page from the ground up, read these 72 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proofs Proof of the approximation property of the supremum, Proof of the diameter characterisation of Cauchy sequences, Proof that the reals form an ordered field, with the Cauchy sequence construction, Proof of the description of the open sets of a metric space, Proof that compactness of a subset can be tested with open sets of the ambient space, Proof that the reals are Archimedean from the completeness axiom, Proof that open balls are open.
- Construction of the reals from Cauchy sequences concept
- Element definition
- Extended real number line object
- Integers object
- Ordered field definition
- Proposition concept
- Rational numbers object
- Real numbers object
- Set bounded above definition
- Set definition
- Ring of integers statement
- Archimedean ordered field definition
- Conjunction definition
- Disjunction definition
- Implication definition
- Predicate definition
- The reals form a field statement
- Supremum definition
- Empty set object
- Family of sets definition
- Ordered pair definition
- Intersection definition
- Union definition
- The rationals form a field statement
- Existential quantifier definition
- Universal quantifier definition
- Completeness axiom statement
- Cartesian product definition
- Subset definition
- Union of a family of sets definition
- The rationals form an ordered field statement
- Uniqueness quantifier definition
- Binary relation definition
- Order on the reals definition
- Topological space definition
- Antisymmetric relation definition
- Reflexive relation definition
- Transitive relation definition
- Function definition
- Subspace topology definition
- Preorder definition
- Restriction of a function definition
- Metric space definition
- Partial order definition
- Subspace metric definition
- Convergence of a sequence in a metric space definition
- Open ball definition
- Triangle inequality for a metric statement
- Diameter of a set definition
- Total order definition
- Metric topology definition
- Totally bounded set definition
- Proof of the diameter characterisation of Cauchy sequences proof
- Open set definition
- Proof that the reals form an ordered field, with the Cauchy sequence construction proof
- Epsilon characterisation of Cauchy sequences statement
- Open cover definition
- Proof of the description of the open sets of a metric space proof
- Complete metric space definition
- The reals form an ordered field statement
- Compact space definition
- Open sets of a metric space statement
- Proof of the approximation property of the supremum proof
- Compact set definition
- Proof that open balls are open proof
- Approximation property of the supremum statement
- Proof that compactness of a subset can be tested with open sets of the ambient space proof
- Open balls are open statement
- Proof that the reals are Archimedean from the completeness axiom proof
- Compactness via open covers statement
- The reals are Archimedean statement
- Proof that a set is compact iff it is complete and totally bounded proof
Where this leads
26 pages build on this one.
- Non-uniqueness for a non-Lipschitz equation
- Arzelà–Ascoli theorem
- Compact iff complete and totally bounded
- Peano existence theorem
- Proof of the Peano existence theorem by Euler polygons
- Hellinger–Reissner principle
- Carathéodory's existence theorem
- Céa's lemma
- Vanishing mean oscillation
- Finite element method in structural mechanics
- Lax–Milgram theorem
- Minimum total potential energy principle
- Schauder fixed-point theorem for integral equations
- Poincaré inequality
- Korn's inequality
- Compactness of integral operators
- Galerkin method
- Compactness of families of harmonic functions
- Jentzsch's theorem on positive kernels
- Kneser's theorem on solution sets
- Hu–Washizu principle
- Ladyzhenskaya–Babuška–Brezzi condition
- Automorphism group of a bounded domain is a Lie group
- Rellich–Kondrachov theorem
- Proof of the Arzelà–Ascoli theorem by total boundedness
- Montel's theorem
Further reading
- Web https://www.math.ucla.edu/~tao/resource/general/121.1.00s/compact.pdf, Theorem 3.5 and Theorem 6.1
About this page
| Tag | WGDP75TY9F |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://WGDP75TY9F |
| Kind | proof |
| Writing | W0 stub |
| MSC | 54E45 |
| Proves | Compact iff complete and totally bounded |
| Uses | Compactness via open covers, Totally bounded set, Complete metric space, Subspace metric, Epsilon characterisation of Cauchy sequences, Convergence of a sequence in a metric space, Open ball, Open balls are open, Metric topology, Diameter of a set, Triangle inequality for a metric, The reals are Archimedean |
| Changed | 4 November 2026 |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.