Math 2.0

Functions of a complex variable Proof

Proof of the Cauchy–Hadamard theorem

Builds on Radius of convergencePower seriesLimit superiorDecreasing sequence bounded below convergesEpsilon-N definition of the limit of a sequenceApproximation property of the supremumSupremumBinomial theoremThe reals are ArchimedeanBounded sequence

Proof

We work from the definition of the radius of convergence and compare ∣an∣\abs{a_n} with powers tnt^n.

  1. Let ∑an(x−c)n\sum a_n (x - c)^n be a real power series. For n≥1n \ge 1 let xn=∣an∣1/n≥0x_n = \abs{a_n}^{1/n} \ge 0.
  2. Let ℓ=lim sup⁡n→∞xn\ell = \limsup_{n \to \infty} x_n, the limit superior. If (xn)(x_n) is not bounded above, then ℓ=∞\ell = \infty by convention. Otherwise (xn)(x_n) is bounded, since xn≥0x_n \ge 0, and 0≤ℓ<∞0 \le \ell < \infty.
  3. Let TT be the set of r≥0r \ge 0 for which (∣an∣rn)(\abs{a_n} r^n) is bounded. By the definition, R=sup⁡TR = \sup T, with R=∞R = \infty when TT is not bounded above.
  4. The number 00 lies in TT, since ∣an∣0n=0\abs{a_n} 0^n = 0 for n≥1n \ge 1.
  5. Claim A: if ℓ<∞\ell < \infty, r>0r > 0 and rℓ<1r \ell < 1, then r∈Tr \in T. To see this, pick tt with ℓ<t<1/r\ell < t < 1/r.
  6. When ℓ<∞\ell < \infty, let sn=sup⁡{xk:k≥n}s_n = \sup \set{x_k : k \ge n}. The sequence (sn)(s_n) decreases and converges to its infimum, which is ℓ\ell.
  7. Since t>ℓt > \ell, the epsilon-N form gives N≥1N \ge 1 with sN<ts_N < t. So xk<tx_k < t for all k≥Nk \ge N.
  8. For k≥Nk \ge N, step 7 gives ∣ak∣<tk\abs{a_k} < t^k. So ∣ak∣rk<(tr)k≤1\abs{a_k} r^k < (t r)^k \le 1, since 0<tr<10 < t r < 1.
  9. The finitely many terms with k<Nk < N are bounded by their maximum. So (∣ak∣rk)(\abs{a_k} r^k) is bounded, and r∈Tr \in T. This proves Claim A.
  10. Claim B: if r>0r > 0 and rℓ>1r \ell > 1, then r∉Tr \notin T. Here rℓ>1r \ell > 1 is read as true for all r>0r > 0 when ℓ=∞\ell = \infty.
  11. Pick tt with 1/r<t<ℓ1/r < t < \ell. When ℓ=∞\ell = \infty, take t=2/rt = 2/r. We show that for each n≥1n \ge 1 there is k≥nk \ge n with xk>tx_k > t.
  12. If ℓ<∞\ell < \infty, then sn≥ℓ>ts_n \ge \ell > t, because ℓ\ell is the infimum of the sns_n. The approximation property of the supremum gives k≥nk \ge n with xk>tx_k > t.
  13. If ℓ=∞\ell = \infty, then (xk)(x_k) is not bounded above. So some xkx_k exceeds max⁡(t,x1,…,xn)\max(t, x_1, \dots, x_n). Such a kk is not in {1,…,n}\set{1, \dots, n}, so k>nk > n and xk>tx_k > t.
  14. Let q=tr>1q = t r > 1. If xk>tx_k > t, then ∣ak∣>tk\abs{a_k} > t^k and ∣ak∣rk>qk\abs{a_k} r^k > q^k.
  15. By the binomial theorem, qk=(1+(q−1))k≥1+k(q−1)q^k = (1 + (q - 1))^k \ge 1 + k (q - 1), since all the terms of the expansion are nonnegative.
  16. Let CC be a real number. The reals are Archimedean, so there is n≥1n \ge 1 with n(q−1)>Cn (q - 1) > C.
  17. Steps 11 to 13 give k≥nk \ge n with xk>tx_k > t. Steps 14 and 15 give ∣ak∣rk>1+k(q−1)>C\abs{a_k} r^k > 1 + k (q - 1) > C.
  18. So (∣ak∣rk)(\abs{a_k} r^k) is not bounded, and r∉Tr \notin T. This proves Claim B.
  19. Case ℓ=0\ell = 0. Claim A gives every r>0r > 0 in TT. So TT is not bounded above, and R=∞=1/ℓR = \infty = 1/\ell.
  20. Case ℓ=∞\ell = \infty. Claim B gives T={0}T = \set{0}, with step 4. So R=0=1/ℓR = 0 = 1/\ell.
  21. Case 0<ℓ<∞0 < \ell < \infty. By Claim B, every element of TT is at most 1/ℓ1/\ell, so 1/ℓ1/\ell is an upper bound of TT.
  22. In this case, let b<1/ℓb < 1/\ell. The number r=(max⁡(b,0)+1/ℓ)/2r = (\max(b, 0) + 1/\ell)/2 satisfies b<r<1/ℓb < r < 1/\ell, and r∈Tr \in T by Claim A. So no number below 1/ℓ1/\ell is an upper bound.
  23. By steps 21 and 22 and the definition of the supremum, R=1/ℓR = 1/\ell.
  24. In all cases R=1/ℓR = 1/\ell. With the conventions 1/0=∞1/0 = \infty and 1/∞=01/\infty = 0, this is 1/R=lim sup⁡n→∞∣an∣1/n1/R = \limsup_{n \to \infty} \abs{a_n}^{1/n}.

Idea

The number ℓ\ell measures the exponential growth rate of ∣an∣\abs{a_n}: eventually ∣an∣<tn\abs{a_n} < t^n for each t>ℓt > \ell, and ∣an∣>tn\abs{a_n} > t^n infinitely often for each t<ℓt < \ell. So ∣an∣rn\abs{a_n} r^n stays bounded when rℓ<1r \ell < 1 and grows without bound when rℓ>1r \ell > 1. The cutoff is r=1/ℓr = 1/\ell.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 66 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proofs Proof of the approximation property of the supremum, Proof that the reals form an ordered field, with the Cauchy sequence construction, Proof of Pascal's rule from the recursive definition, Proof of the epsilon-N definition of the limit of a sequence, Proof of the factorial formula for binomial coefficients by induction, Proof of the binomial theorem by induction, Proof that a decreasing sequence bounded below converges, Proof that the reals are Archimedean from the completeness axiom, Proof of the monotone convergence theorem for sequences.

  1. Binomial coefficient definition
  2. Construction of the reals from Cauchy sequences concept
  3. Element definition
  4. Factorial definition
  5. Group concept
  6. Integers object
  7. Mathematical induction concept
  8. Ordered field definition
  9. Proposition concept
  10. Rational numbers object
  11. Real numbers object
  12. Sequence definition
  13. Set bounded above definition
  14. Proof of Pascal's rule from the recursive definition proof
  15. Set definition
  16. Ring definition
  17. Ring of integers statement
  18. Archimedean ordered field definition
  19. Implication definition
  20. Predicate definition
  21. The reals form a field statement
  22. Real sequence definition
  23. Infimum definition
  24. Supremum definition
  25. Pascal's rule statement
  26. Ordered pair definition
  27. Commutative ring definition
  28. The rationals form a field statement
  29. Universal quantifier definition
  30. Bounded sequence definition
  31. Limit of a sequence definition
  32. Monotone sequence definition
  33. Series definition
  34. Completeness axiom statement
  35. Cartesian product definition
  36. Proof of the factorial formula for binomial coefficients by induction proof
  37. Subset definition
  38. Limit superior definition
  39. The rationals form an ordered field statement
  40. Power series definition
  41. Binary relation definition
  42. Factorial formula for binomial coefficients statement
  43. Order on the reals definition
  44. Radius of convergence definition
  45. Antisymmetric relation definition
  46. Reflexive relation definition
  47. Transitive relation definition
  48. Proof of the binomial theorem by induction proof
  49. Binomial theorem statement
  50. Preorder definition
  51. Partial order definition
  52. Total order definition
  53. Proof that the reals form an ordered field, with the Cauchy sequence construction proof
  54. The reals form an ordered field statement
  55. Absolute value definition
  56. Proof of the approximation property of the supremum proof
  57. Proof of the epsilon-N definition of the limit of a sequence proof
  58. Approximation property of the supremum statement
  59. Epsilon-N definition of the limit of a sequence statement
  60. Proof that the reals are Archimedean from the completeness axiom proof
  61. The reals are Archimedean statement
  62. Proof of the monotone convergence theorem for sequences proof
  63. Monotone convergence theorem for sequences statement
  64. Proof that a decreasing sequence bounded below converges proof
  65. Decreasing sequence bounded below converges statement
  66. Proof of the Cauchy–Hadamard theorem proof

Where this leads

435 pages build on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy%E2%80%93Hadamard_theorem, Theorem for one complex variable
About this page
Tag1DCZV68ZBR
URIm2://1DCZV68ZBR
Kindproof
WritingW0 stub
MSC30B10
ProvesCauchy–Hadamard theorem
UsesRadius of convergence, Power series, Limit superior, Decreasing sequence bounded below converges, Epsilon-N definition of the limit of a sequence, Approximation property of the supremum, Supremum, Binomial theorem, The reals are Archimedean, Bounded sequence
Changed4 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.